This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0272989X08327494v1 29/3/325    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Miller, G. Articles by Galbreath, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, G. Articles by Galbreath, A. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Disease Management in Systolic Heart Failure

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: george.miller{at}altarum.org.

	Abstract

Background. Although congestive heart failure (CHF) is a primary target for disease management programs, previous studies have generated mixed results regarding the effectiveness and cost savings of disease management when applied to CHF. Objective. We estimated the long-term impact of systolic heart failure disease management from the results of an 18-month clinical trial. Methods. We used data generated from the trial (starting population distributions, resource utilization, mortality rates, and transition probabilities) in a Markov model to project results of continuing the disease management program for the patients’ lifetimes. Outputs included distribution of illness severity, mortality, resource consumption, and the cost of resources consumed. Both cost and effectiveness were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. Cost-effectiveness was computed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Results. Model results were validated against trial data and indicated that, over their lifetimes, patients experienced a lifespan extension of 51 days. Combined discounted lifetime program and medical costs were $4850 higher in the disease management group than the control group, but the program had a favorable long-term discounted cost-effectiveness of $43,650/QALY. These results are robust to assumptions regarding mortality rates, theimpactof aging on thecostofcare, the discount rate, utility values, and the targeted population. Conclusions. Estimation of the clinical benefits and financial burden of disease management can be enhanced by model-based analyses to project costs and effectiveness. Our results suggest that disease management of heart failure patients can be cost-effective over the long term.

First published on January 15, 2009, doi:10.1177/0272989X08327494

Medical Decision Making 2009;29:325.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?