Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X08326147v1
29/1/15    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ayton, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ayton, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Asthma
*Epilepsy
*Hemophilia
*Kidney Diseases
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

What Would It Be Like for Me and for You? Judged Impact of Chronic Health Conditions on Happiness

Emma Walsh* and Peter Ayton

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: e.l.walsh{at}city.ac.uk.


   Abstract
Background. People overestimate the impact of health conditions on happiness, putatively because they focus excessively on resulting negative consequences while disregarding the impact of other unchanged aspects of life on happiness. However, typically, inferences about accuracy have been based on a confound of the viewpoint of judgments (Self/Other) with whether the respondent has the condition (Have/Not-have)—an important issue because people often judge themselves as different to others. This study measured Haves’ and Not-haves’ judged impact on happiness—for self and other—of several chronic health conditions, and whether ‘‘defocusing’’ respondents improved judgment. Method. 80 Haves and 80 Not-haves predicted the impact of health conditions on their own and others’ happiness using a questionnaire, after some participated in a defocusing exercise. Haves also indicated their preferences for their health condition over other conditions. Results. Although Haves made more accurate forecasts than Not-haves, both overestimated the impact of health conditions on others’ happiness— yet defocusing respondents prior to prediction had no effect. Haves were aware that Not-haves misjudge Haves’ happiness, but underestimated the bias in Not-haves’ judgments. Whereas Haves judged they were more happy than other Haves, Not-haves predicted they would be less happy than others if living with a health condition. Finally, Haves’ preferences for health conditions exhibited an endowment effect. Conclusion. The existence of an impact bias is not attributable to the confounding of self/other and Have/Not-have in other studies. People who have a condition forecasted others’ happiness more accurately, suggesting that experience of one condition helps in comprehending life with another.

First published on December 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/0272989X08326147

Medical Decision Making 2009;29:15.

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?