This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0272989X08326146v1 28/6/866    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Spring, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Spring, B. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Health Literacy Healthy Living Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Health Decision Making: Lynchpin of Evidence-Based Practice

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bspring{at}northwestern.edu.

	Abstract

Health decision making is both the lynchpin and the least developed aspect of evidence-based practice. The evidence-based practice process requires integrating the evidence with consideration of practical resources and patient preferences and doing so via a process that is genuinely collaborative. Yet, the literature is largely silent about how to accomplish integrative, shared decision making. Implications for evidence-based practice are discussed for 2 theories of clinician decision making (expected utility and fuzzy trace) and 2 theories of patient health decision making (transtheoretical model and reasoned action). Three suggestions are offered. First, it would be advantageous to have theory-based algorithms that weight and integrate the 3 data strands (evidence, resources, preferences) in different decisional contexts. Second, patients, not providers, make the decisions of greatest impact on public health, and those decisions are behavioral. Consequently, theory explicating how provider-patient collaboration can influence patient lifestyle decisions made miles from the provider’s office is greatly needed. Third, although the preponderance of data on complex decisions supports a computational approach, such an approach to evidence-based practice is too impractical to be widely applied at present. More troublesomely, until patients come to trust decisions made computationally more than they trust their providers’ intuitions, patient adherence will remain problematic. A good theory of integrative, collaborative health decision making remains needed.

First published on November 17, 2008, doi:10.1177/0272989X08326146

Medical Decision Making 2008;28:866.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. F. Reyna Theories of Medical Decision Making and Health: An Evidence-Based Approach Med Decis Making, November 1, 2008; 28(6): 829 - 833. [PDF]