This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0272989X08324036v1 28/5/650    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sutton, A. J. Articles by Stevenson, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sutton, A. J. Articles by Stevenson, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Health Screening Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Integration of Meta-analysis and Economic Decision Modeling for Evaluating Diagnostic Tests

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ajs22{at}le.ac.uk.

	Abstract

Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data is more difficult than of effectiveness data because of 1) statistical challenges of dealing with multiple measures of accuracy (e.g., sensitivity and specificity) simultaneously and 2) incorporating threshold effects. A number of meta-analysis models are in use, ranging from naïve synthesis of independent sensitivity and specificity to optimization of a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Little work has been done on how such analyses should inform decision models. This article aims to present a unified framework for the synthesis of primary data and economic evaluation of alternative diagnostic testing strategies using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation methods. The authors extend this previous work by using systematic review to derive model parameters, fully allowing for uncertainty in their estimation, and formally incorporating variability between study results into the decision analysis. Using a simple decision model comparing alternative testing strategies for suspected deep vein thrombosis as an example, the authors consider how to use outputs of different alternative meta-analysis models in decision models. They also explore the limitations of diagnostic test studies, particularly when there is no obvious threshold value. To correct some of the limitations of diagnostic test studies, they propose that tests with implicit and explicit thresholds should be studied using distinctly different frameworks. Specifically, when a threshold exists, quantitative threshold information should be included in metaanalysis models to aid interpretation of SROCs. Setting policy to relate to a specific point may be much more difficult for studies with implicit thresholds. Key words: diagnostic test; economic decision modeling; meta-analysis; Bayesian methods; deep vein thrombosis; evidence synthesis. (Med Decis Making XXXX;XX:xx–xx)

First published on August 27, 2008, doi:10.1177/0272989X08324036

Medical Decision Making 2008;28:650.

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Cornell, C. D. Mulrow, and A. R. Localio Diagnostic Test Accuracy and Clinical Decision Making Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2008; 149(12): 904 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF]