Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X08315253v1
28/4/462    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pakhomov, S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pakhomov, S.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetic Foot
*Health Checkup
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Quality Performance Measurement Using the Text of Electronic Medical Records

Serguei Pakhomov, PhD*, Susan Bjornsen, RN, MA, Penny Hanson, and Steven Smith, MD

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pakh0002{at}umn.edu.


   Abstract
Background. Annual foot examinations (FE) constitute a critical component of care for diabetes. Documented evidence of FE is central to quality-of-care reporting; however, manual abstraction of electronic medical records (EMR) is slow, expensive, and subject to error. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that text mining of the EMR results in ascertaining FE evidence with accuracy comparable to manual abstraction. Methods. The text of inpatient and outpatient clinical reports was searched with natural-language (NL) queries for evidence of neurological, vascular, and structural components of FE. A manual medical records audit was used for validation. The reference standard consisted of 3 independent sets used for development (n = 200), validation (n = 118), and reliability (n = 80). Results. The reliability of manual auditing was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 85-97) and was determined by comparing the results of an additional audit to the original audit using the records in the reliability set. The accuracy of the NL query requiring 1 of 3 FE components was 89% (95% CI = 83-95). The accuracy of the query requiring any 2 of 3 components was 88% (95% CI = 82-94). The accuracy of the query requiring all 3 components was 75% (95% CI = 68-83). Conclusions. Thefreetextofthe EMRisa viable source of information necessary for quality of health care reporting on the evidence of FE for patients with diabetes. The low-cost methodology is scalable to monitoring large numbers of patients and can be used to streamline quality-of-care reporting. Key words: performance measures; quality indicators; data mining. (Med Decis Making XXXX;XX:xx–xx)

First published on May 13, 2008, doi:10.1177/0272989X08315253

Medical Decision Making 2008;28:462.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?