Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nelsonw{at}mail.nih.gov.

	Abstract

Health decision aids are a potentially valuable adjunct to patient-physician communication and decision making. Although the overarching goal of decision aids— to help patients make informed, preference-sensitive choices—is widely accepted, experts do not agree on the means to achieve this end. In this article, the authors critically examine the theoretical basis and appropriateness of 2 widely accepted criteria used to evaluate decision aids: values clarification and reduction of decisional conflict. First, they argue that although clarifying values is central to decision making under uncertainty, it is not clear that decision aids—as they have been conceived and operationalized so far—can and should be used to achieve this goal. The pursuit of clarifying values, particularly values clarification exercises, raises a number of ethical, methodological, and conceptual issues, and the authors suggest research questions that should be addressed before values clarification is routinely endorsed. Second, the authors argue that the goal of reducing decisional conflict is conceptually untenable and propose that it be eliminated as an objective of decision aids. Key words: decision aids; decision making; decisional conflict; values clarification. (Med Decis Making 2007;XX:xx–xx)

First published on September 14, 2007, doi:10.1177/0272989X07306780

Medical Decision Making 2007;27:609.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. O'Brien, T. J. Whelan, M. Villasis-Keever, A. Gafni, C. Charles, R. Roberts, S. Schiff, and W. Cai Are Cancer-Related Decision Aids Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2009; 27(6): 974 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. LeBlanc, D. A. Kenny, A. M. O'Connor, and F. Legare Decisional Conflict in Patients and Their Physicians: A Dyadic Approach to Shared Decision Making Med Decis Making, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 61 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Pignone Incorporating Decision Analysis in Decision Aids Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 547 - 549. [PDF]

				R. L. Street JR Aiding Medical Decision Making: A Communication Perspective Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 550 - 553. [PDF]

				M. Holmes-Rovner, W. L. Nelson, M. Pignone, G. Elwyn, D. R. Rovner, A. M. O'Connor, A. Coulter, and R. Correa-de-Araujo Are Patient Decision Aids the Best Way to Improve Clinical Decision Making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. McCaffery, L. Irwig, and P. Bossuyt Patient Decision Aids to Support Clinical Decision Making: Evaluating the Decision or the Outcomes of the Decision Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 619 - 625. [Abstract] [PDF]