Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X07306780v1
27/5/609    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ubel, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, W. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ubel, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
First published on September 14, 2007, doi:10.1177/0272989X07306780

Medical Decision Making 2007;27:609.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2007
© 2007 Society for Medical Decision Making

Article

Rethinking the Objectives of Decision Aids: A Call for Conceptual Clarity

Wendy L. Nelson*, Paul K. J. Han, Angela Fagerlin, Michael Stefanek, and Peter A. Ubel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nelsonw{at}mail.nih.gov.


   Abstract
Health decision aids are a potentially valuable adjunct to patient-physician communication and decision making. Although the overarching goal of decision aids— to help patients make informed, preference-sensitive choices—is widely accepted, experts do not agree on the means to achieve this end. In this article, the authors critically examine the theoretical basis and appropriateness of 2 widely accepted criteria used to evaluate decision aids: values clarification and reduction of decisional conflict. First, they argue that although clarifying values is central to decision making under uncertainty, it is not clear that decision aids—as they have been conceived and operationalized so far—can and should be used to achieve this goal. The pursuit of clarifying values, particularly values clarification exercises, raises a number of ethical, methodological, and conceptual issues, and the authors suggest research questions that should be addressed before values clarification is routinely endorsed. Second, the authors argue that the goal of reducing decisional conflict is conceptually untenable and propose that it be eliminated as an objective of decision aids. Key words: decision aids; decision making; decisional conflict; values clarification. (Med Decis Making 2007;XX:xx–xx)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Pignone
Incorporating Decision Analysis in Decision Aids
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 547 - 549.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
R. L. Street JR
Aiding Medical Decision Making: A Communication Perspective
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 550 - 553.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Holmes-Rovner, W. L. Nelson, M. Pignone, G. Elwyn, D. R. Rovner, A. M. O'Connor, A. Coulter, and R. Correa-de-Araujo
Are Patient Decision Aids the Best Way to Improve Clinical Decision Making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 599 - 608.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
K. McCaffery, L. Irwig, and P. Bossuyt
Patient Decision Aids to Support Clinical Decision Making: Evaluating the Decision or the Outcomes of the Decision
Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 619 - 625.
[Abstract] [PDF]