Measuring Numeracy without a Math Test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fagerlin{at}umich.edu.

	Abstract

Background. Basic numeracy skills are necessary before patients can understand the risks of medical treatments. Previous research has used objective measures, similar to mathematics tests, to evaluate numeracy. Objectives. To design a subjective measure (i.e., self-assessment) of quantitative ability that distinguishes low-and high-numerate individuals yet is less aversive, quicker to administer, and more useable for telephone and Internet surveys than existing numeracy measures. Research Design. Paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Subjects. The general public (N = 703) surveyed at 2 hospitals. Measures. Forty-nine subjective numeracy questions were compared to measures of objective numeracy. Results. An 8-item measure, the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS), was developed through several rounds of testing. Four items measure people’s beliefs about their skill in performing various mathematical operations, and 4 measure people’s preferences regarding the presentation of numerical information. The SNS was significantly correlated with Lipkus and others’ objective numeracy scale (correlations: 0.63-0.68) yet was completed in less time (24 s/item v. 31 s/item, P < 0:05) and was perceived as less stressful (1.62 v. 2.69, P < 0:01) and less frustrating (1.92 v. 2.88, P < 0:01). Fifty percent of participants who completed the SNS volunteered to participate in another study, whereas only 8% of those who completed the Lipkus and others scale similarly volunteered (odds ratio = 11.00, 95% confidence interval = 2.14-56.65). Conclusions. The SNS correlates well with mathematical test measures of objective numeracy but can be administered in less time and with less burden. In addition, it is much more likely to leave participants willing to participate in additional research and shows much lower rates of missing or incomplete data. Key words: numeracy; risk communication; decision making; literacy; measurement. (Med Decis Making XXXX; XX:xx-xx)
CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Hamm, D. E. Bard, E. Hsieh, and H. F. Stein Contingent or Universal Approaches to Patient Deficiencies in Health Numeracy Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 635 - 637. [PDF]

				B. J. Zikmund-Fisher, D. M. Smith, P. A. Ubel, and A. Fagerlin Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: Effects of Low Numeracy on Comprehension of Risk Communications and Utility Elicitations Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 663 - 671. [Abstract] [PDF]