Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Weijden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Grol, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Weijden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Grol, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Anxiety
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in General Practice: Mismatch between Cardiovascular Risk and Patients' Risk Perceptions

T. van der Weijden, PhD, MD

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Trudy.vanderWeijden{at}hag.unimaas.nl

B. van Steenkiste

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

H.E.J.H. Stoffers, PhD, MD

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

D.R.M. Timmermans, PhD

Department of Social Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

R. Grol, PhD

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Objective. Guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) emphasize identifying high-risk patients for more intensive management, but patients' misconceptions of risk hamper implementation. Insight is needed into the type of patients that general practitioners (GPs) encounter in their cardiovascular prevention activities. How appropriate are the risk perceptions and worries of patients with whom GPs discuss CVD risks? What determines inappropriate risk perception? Method. Cross-sectional study in 34 general practices. The study included patients aged 40 to 70 years with whom CVD risk was discussed during consultation. After the consultation, the GPs completed a registration form, and patients completed a questionnaire. Correlations between patients' actual CVD risk and risk perceptions were analyzed. Results. In total, 490 patients were included. In 17% of the consultations, patients were actually at high risk. Risk was perceived inappropriately by nearly 4 in 5 high-risk patients (incorrect optimism) and by 1 in 5 low-risk patients (incorrect pessimism). Smoking, hypertension, and obesity were determinants of perceiving CVD risk as high, whereas surprisingly, diabetic patients did not report any anxiety about their CVD risk. Men were more likely to perceive their CVD risk inappropriately than women. Conclusion. In communicating CVD risk, GPs must be aware that they mostly encounter low-risk patients and that the perceived risk and worry do not necessarily correspond with the actual risk. Incorrect perceptions of CVD risk among men and patients with diabetes were striking.

Key Words: primary prevention • cardiovascular diseases • risk tables • risk score sheet • risk communication • risk perception.

References

  • Thomas S., van der Weijden T., van Drenth BB, Haverkort AFM, Hooi JD, van der Laan JD NHG-standaard Cholesterol (eerste herziening). Huisarts Wet. 1999;42:406—17.
  • de Backer G., Ambrosioni E., Borch Johnsen K., et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease and prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1601—10.[Free Full Text]
  • van der Weijden T., Dansen A., Schouten BJ, Knottnerus JA, Grol RP Comparison of appropriateness of cholesterol testing in general practice with the recommendations of national guidelines: an audit of patient records in 20 general practices. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:218—22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • van Steenkiste BC, van der Weijden T., Stoffers Hejh, Grol R. Barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk tables in routine general practice. Scan J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:32—7.[CrossRef]
  • van Steenkiste B., van der Weijden T., Timmermans D., Vaes J., Stoffers Hejh, Grol R. Patients' ideas, fears and expectations of their coronary risk: barriers for primary prevention. Pat Educ Couns. 2004;55:301—7.[CrossRef]
  • Avis NE, Smith KW, McKinlay JB Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can they be changed? Am J Public Health. 1989;17:1608—12.
  • Kreuter MW, Strechter VJ Changing inaccurate perceptions of health risk: results from a randomised trial. Health Psych. 1995;14:56—63.[CrossRef]
  • Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL, Pyke S., Thompson SG Readiness for lifestyle advice: self-assessment of coronary risk prior to screening in the British Family Heart Study. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45:5—8.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Samsa GP, Cohen SJ, Goldstein LB, et al. Knowledge of risk among patients at increased risk of stroke. Stroke. 1997;28:916—21. 10. Frijling BD, Lobo CM, Keus IM, et al. Perceptions of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes. Pat Educ Couns. 2004;52:47—53.[CrossRef]
  • Lewis DK, Robinson J., Wilkinson E. Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinician's and lay people's attitude. BMJ. 2003;327:841—7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Cockburn J., Pit S. Prescribing behaviour in general practice: patients' expectations and doctor's perceptions of patients' expectations: a questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997;315:520—3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423—33.[Abstract]
  • Kaplan SH, Greenfield S., Ware JE Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;275:5110—27.
  • van Steenkiste B., van der Weijden T., Stoffers Hejh, Kester ADM, Timmermans D., Grol R. Improving cardiovascular risk management: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of a decision support tool for patients and physicians. Eur J Cardiov Prev Rehab. 2007;14:44-50.[CrossRef]
  • Conroy RM, Pyorala K., Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:987—1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Adriaanse MC, Snoek FJ, Dekker JM, et al. Perceived risk for type 2 diabetes in participants in a stepwise population-screening programme. Diabetes Med. 2003;20:210—5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:267—86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Slovic P., Finucane ML, Peters E., MacGregor DG Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 2004;24:311—22.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lipkus IM, Kuchibhatla M., McBride CM, et al. Relationships among breast cancer patients' perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries. Cancer Epid Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9: 973—5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 6, 754-761 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07305323


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
L. Acheson
In this issue: community care, healing, and excellence in research.
Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2008; 6(4): 290 - 291.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Weijden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Grol, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Weijden, T.
Right arrow Articles by Grol, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Anxiety
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?