|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 26, No. 6,
606-616 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295358
The Impact of Unstable Angina Guidelines in the Triage of Emergency Department Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome
David A. Katz, MD, MSc
Department of Medicine, Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin Madison; SE626 GH, Center for Research in the Implementation of Innovative Strategies in Practice (CRIISP) VA Iowa Health Care Systems, Iowa City, IA 52246-2208; phone: (319) 338-0581, ext. 7598; fax: (319) 887-4932 david-katz{at}uiowa.edu
Tom P. Aufderheide, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee
Mark Bogner, MD
Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison
Peter R. Rahko, MD
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison
Roger L. Brown, PhD
Department of, Nursing, University of Wisconsin Madison
Lisa M. Brown, BA
Matthew E. Prekker, BA
Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison
Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH
Objective. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether implementing the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Unstable Angina Practice Guideline improves emergency physician's decision making in patients with symptoms of possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including those for whom the diagnosis of unstable angina is uncertain. Methods. The authors conducted a prospective guideline implementation trial with pre-post design in the emergency departments of 1 university hospital and 1 university-affiliated community teaching hospital from January 2000 to May 2001. They enrolled 1140 adults who presented with chest pain or other symptoms of possible ACS. The intervention included the following: 1) physician training in use of the AHCPR risk groups, 2) algorithm for risk stratification, and 3) group feedback. To determine how accurately physicians interpreted the guideline algorithm, the authors compared their risk ratings with actual guideline risk groups. Results. No significant difference in physician triage decisions was observed between baseline and intervention periods. Analysis of physician's risk ratings during the intervention period revealed low overall concordance with actual guideline risk groups (kappa = 0.31); however, physician's risk ratings showed superior discrimination in identifying patients with confirmed ACS (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area .81 v. .74, P = 0.008). Strict adherence to guideline recommendations would have resulted in hospitalizing 9% more non-ACS patients without lowering the rate of missed ACS. Conclusion. Implementation of the AHCPR guideline did not improve triage decisions in emergency department patients with possible ACS. Assessing physician triage solely based on concordance with the AHCPR guideline may not accurately reflect the quality of patient care.
Key Words: practice guidelines unstable angina triage emergency medical services risk assessment clinical trials
References
- Hamm R, Zubialde J. Physician's expert cognition and the problem of cognitive biases. Prim Care. 1995;22:181212.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Green LA, Yates JF. Influence of pseudodiagnostic information on the evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Ann Emerg Med 1995;25:451457.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Selker H, Zalenski R, Antman E, et al. Evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:1387.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zalenski RJ, Selker HP, Cannon CP, et al. National Heart Attack Alert Program position paper: chest pain centers and programs for the evaluation of acute cardiac ischemia. Ann Emerg Med 2000;35:462471.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lau J. Diagnosing acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review of the accuracy and clinical effect of current technologies. Ann Emerg Med 2001;37:453460.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Braunwald E, Brown J, Brown L, et al. Unstable Angina: Diagnosis and Management. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 10. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.
- Braunwald E, Antman E, Beasley J, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina). Circulation. 2002;106:18931900.[Free Full Text]
- Mills B, Estrada S, Reyna V, et al. Evaluating clinical guidelines and predictive instruments for acute cardiac ischemia. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:E21-E21.
- Hollander J. Risk stratification of emergency department patients with chest pain: the need for standardized reporting guidelines. Ann Emerg Med 2004;43:6870.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Canto JG, Shlipak MG, Rogers WJ, et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. JAMA. 2000;283:32233229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000;342:11631170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Miller CD, Lindsell CJ, Khandelwal S, et al. Is the initial diagnostic impression of "noncardiac chest pain" adequate to exclude cardiac disease? Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:565574.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lloyd F, Reyna V, Liebowitz R, Valenzuela T. The AHCPR unstable angina algorithm in practice [letter]. JAMA. 1997;277: 961962.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cook T, Campbell D. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
- Van der Does E, Lubsen J, Pool J. Acute coronary events in a general practice: objectives and design of the Imminent Myocardial Infarction Rotterdam Study. Heart Bull 1976;7:9198.
- NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Ggetting evidence into practice. Effective Health Care. 1999;5:1-16.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care. 1992;1:184191.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001; 39:II46II54.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: why do some hospitals succeed? JAMA. 2001;285:26042611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fesmire FM, Peterson ED, Roe MT, Wojcik JF. Early use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the ED treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a local quality improvement initiative. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21:302308.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gilbert EH, Lowenstein SR, Koziol-McLain J, Barta DC, Steiner J. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:305308.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Katz D, Griffith J, Beshansky J, Selker H. The use of empiric clinical data in the evaluation of practice guidelines for unstable angina. JAMA. 1996;276:15681574.[Abstract]
- Cairns C, Niemann J, Selker H, Laks M. A computerized version of the time-insensitive predictive instrument: use of the Q wave, ST segment, T wave and patient history in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by the computerized ECG. J Electrocardiol. 1991;24:S46S49.
- Selker HP, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia: a multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:845855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee. Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/ American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959969.[Free Full Text]
- Hollander JE, Blomkains A, Brogan G. Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of ED patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11:13311340.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cannon C, Battler A, Brindis R, et al. ACC key elements and data definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:21142130.[Free Full Text]
- Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. London: Arnold; 2000.
- Huber P. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967.
- Rogers W. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull 1993;13:1923.
- Fleiss J. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2003.
- Hanley J, McNeil B. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:189202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tunis S, Hayward R, Wilson M, et al. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:956963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, Bass EB. Practice guidelines: what are internists looking for? J Gen Intern Med 1996;11:176178.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pathman D, Konrad T, Freed G, Freeman V, Koch G. The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance: the case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care. 1996;34:873889.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Soumerai S, Avorn J. Principles of education outreach (academic detailing) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990; 263:549556.[Abstract]
- Soumerai S, McLaughlin T, Gurwitz J, et al. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;279:13581363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pozen M, D'Agostino R, Selker H, Sytkowski P, Hood W Jr. A predictive instrument to improve coronary care unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1984;310:12731278.[Abstract]
- Lee T, Pearson S, Johnson P, et al. Failure of information as an intervention to modify clinical management: a time-series trial in patients with acute chest pain. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:434437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Reilly BM, Evans AT, Schaider JJ, et al. Impact of a clinical decision rule on hospital triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. JAMA. 2002;288:342350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Farkouh M, Smars P, Reeder G, et al. A clinical trial of a chestpain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1998;339:18821888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tatum J, Jesse R, Kontos M. A comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:116125.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Iliadis E, Klein L, Vandenberg B, et al. Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment. J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:16891695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Giugliano RP, Lloyd-Jones DM, Camargo CA Jr, Makary MA, O'Donnell CJ. Association of unstable angina guideline care with improved survival. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:17751780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Allen LA, O'Donnell CJ, Giugliano RP, Camargo CA Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM. Care concordant with guidelines predicts decreased long-term mortality in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93:12181222.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Brotons C, Permanyer-Miralda G, Calvo F, et al. Validation of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) classification for managing unstable angina. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:959965.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Roger V, Farkouh M, Weston S, et al. Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina. JAMA. 2000;283:646652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Weingarten S. Practice guidelines and prediction rules should be subject to careful clinical testing. JAMA. 1997;277:19771978.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, et al. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995;4:5561.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- van der Steen J, Ooms ME, van der Wal G, Ribbe MW. Withholding or starting antibiotic treatment in patients with dementia and pneumonia: prediction of mortality with physicians' judgment of illness severity and with specific prognostic models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:210221.[Abstract]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Katz, J. Dawson, J. R. Beshansky, P. S. Rahko, T. P. Aufderheide, M. Bogner, H. Tighouart, and H. P. Selker
Does Concordance with Guideline Triage Recommendations Affect Clinical Care of Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome?
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 2007;
27(4):
423 - 437.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|