Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relation of Observer Agreement to Accuracy According to a Two-receiver Signal Detection Model of Diagnosis

Michael F. Quinn, MD

A long-standing problem of medical diagnosis is why rates of observer disagreement are so high. To study this question a model of test interpretation is defined which accounts for disagreement when observers use identical diagnostic strategies. Test subjects are assigned to one of two disease classes on the basis of two parameters: the test score and A, the diagnostic certainty, a parameter analogous to signal-to-noise ratio. The rate of disagreement and the mean error rate of independent ideal observers are derived as a function of diagnostic strategy. It follows from the model that: 1) Maximization of the ratio of disagreement to error defines an optimal diagnostic strategy with advantages over maximum likelihood and Bayes diagnostic strategies. 2) Disagreement exceeds error if the sensitivity and specificity of in dependent observers exceed one-half for all A. 3) The ratio of disagreement to error can be no greater than two if test interpretation is dichotomous but can approach infinity for tricho tomous interpretation, i.e., if observers are allowed to interpret cases as indeterminate.

Key Words: Key words: Bayesian statistics • maximum likelihood • signal-to-noise ratio. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:196-206)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 3, 196-206 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. M. Bossuyt, J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. M. Irwig, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. C.W. de Vet, and J. G. Lijmer
The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
Ann Intern Med, January 7, 2003; 138(1): W1 - W12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Lijmer, B. W. Mol, S. Heisterkamp, G. J. Bonsel, M. H. Prins, J. H. P. van der Meulen, and P. M. M. Bossuyt
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
JAMA, September 15, 1999; 282(11): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]