Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nease, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sox, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nease, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Sox, H. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Threshold Analysis Using Diagnostic Tests with Multiple Results

Robert F. Nease

Douglas K. Owens

Harold C. Sox

Clinical problems represented by decision trees can be analyzed in terms of the probability threshold model, which provides management recommendations based on the prior prob ability of disease, the test threshold, and the test-treatment threshold. As originally proposed, the threshold model assumes that diagnostic tests provide information about a single event that is relevant to the decision. For some problems, however, a diagnostic test may provide information about more than one such event (e.g., a computed tomography [CT] scan gives information about both mediastinal and hilar metastases in lung cancer). The authors extend the probability threshold model to cases in which a single test provides information about two events that are relevant to the decision. They derive four thresholds that determine the best strategy for any combination of test results. The approach is illustrated for the decision to use a CT scan to stage lung cancer. The analysis reveals that: 1) the range of prior probabilities for which testing is optimal increases; 2) for some prior probabilities only test results about one event are important; 3) for some prior probabilities test results about both events are important; and 4) failure to account fully for information provided by a test can lead to erroneous test and treatment recommendations. Key words: decision theory; Bayes theorem; decision making, computer-assisted; decision support technics; predictive value of tests; lung neoplasms; probability threshold; decision analysis. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:91- 103)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 2, 91-103 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LupusHome page
G Sanna, M Piga, J W Terryberry, M T Peltz, S Giagheddu, L Satta, A Ahmed, A Cauli, C Montaldo, G Passiu, et al.
Central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: cerebral imaging and serological profile in patients with and without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations
Lupus, October 1, 2000; 9(8): 573 - 583.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. R. Beck
Decision-making Studies in Patient Management: Twenty Years Later
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1991; 11(2): 112 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]