Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haug, P.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haug, P.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, H. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Revision of Diagnostic Logic Using a Clinical Database

Peter Haug

Paul D. Clayton

Pamela Shelton

Tracy Rich

Irena Tocino

Philip R. Frederick

Robert O. Crapo

William J. Morrison

Homer R. Warner

Statistical pattern-recognition techniques have been frequently applied to the problem of medical diagnosis. Sequential Bayesian approaches are appealing because of the possibility of generating the underlying sensitivities, specificities, and prevalence statistics from the estimates of medical experts. The accuracy of these estimates and the consequences of inaccuracies carry implications for the future development of this type of system. In an effort to explore these subjects, the authors used statistics derived from a clinical database to revise the diagnostic logic in a Bayesian system for generating a differential diagnostic list. Substantial changes in estimated a priori probabilities, sensitivities, and specificities were made to correct for significant under- and overestimations of these values by a group of medical experts. The system based on the derived values appears to perform better than the original system. It is concluded that the statistics used in a Bayesian diagnostic system should be derived from a database representative of the patient population for which the system is designed. Key words: diagnosis; computer-assisted; Bayes theorem; lung dis eases. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:84-90)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 2, 84-90 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?