This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dolan, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dolan, J. G. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Medical Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Choice of Initial Antimicrobial Therapy for Acute Pyelonephritis

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine which of seven recommended antibiotic regimens represented optimal initial therapy for a young woman hospitalized for treat ment of acute pyelonephritis. The model included the following criteria: maximize cure, minimize adverse effects (broken down into very serious, serious, and limited), minimize antibiotic resis tance, and minimize cost (divided into total cost and patient cost). The criteria were weighted according to judgments made by 61 practicing clinicians. Alternatives were compared relative to the criteria using published information on the expected frequencies of urinary pathogens and drug toxicity, local antibiotic sensitivities and antibiotic charges, and expert opinion regarding their propensities for inducing antimicrobial resistance. The analysis identified ampicillin com bined with gentamicin as the optimal regimen. This study illustrates several features of the AHP that make it promising for use in medical decision making: its ability to incorporate multiple criteria into a formal decision model, its procedural simplicity, and its similarity to current patient management guidelines. Further studies to establish the role of the AHP in medical decision making are warranted.

Key Words: Key words: analytic hierarchy process • decision making • pyelonephritis • decision analysis. (Med Decis Making 1989;9:51-56)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 1, 51-56 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900109


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Liberatore, R. Nydick, C. Daskalakis, E. Kunkel, J. Cocroft, and R. Myers Helping Men Decide About Scheduling a Prostate Cancer Screening Exam Interfaces, May 1, 2009; 39(3): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. H. Drew, K. Kawamoto, and M. B. Adams Information technology for optimizing the management of infectious diseases Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2006; 63(10): 957 - 965. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Peralta-Carcelen, C. A. Fargason Jr, D. Coston, and J. G. Dolan Preferences of Pregnant Women and Physicians for 2 Strategies for Prevention of Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Sepsis in Neonates Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 1997; 151(7): 712 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Pryka, G. M. Haig, and K. R. Hagmeyer Pathophysiology and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Journal of Pharmacy Practice, January 1, 1991; 4(4): 226 - 236. [PDF]

				J. G. Dolan, B. J. Isselhardt, and J. D. Cappuccio The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Medical Decision Making: A Tutorial Med Decis Making, February 1, 1989; 9(1): 40 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Eckman A Counterpoint to the Analytic Hierarchy Process Med Decis Making, February 1, 1989; 9(1): 57 - 58. [PDF]