Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curley, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curley, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Yates, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency

Shawn P. Curley, PhD

Mark J. Young, MD

Margaret J. Kingry, PhD, RN

J. Frank Yates, PhD

In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between clinical variables is inordinately influenced by cases seen earlier rather than later in a presentation sequence. In this study, medical and nursing trainees evidenced this behavior in a hypothetical clinical judgment situation. The behavior was tied to an attention decrement explanation, by which inattention to the later-presented cases leads to inaccurate recall of the relative frequencies of observed cases, which in turn induces a misjudgment of a disease-finding contingency. An explicit intervention based on this hypothesis, forcing attention to later cases by warning that recall of the case frequencies would be required, was effective in reducing primacy effects among medical students. A related, but less explicit, intervention was also tried. This intervention did not significantly reduce primacy effects among nursing students, but was somewhat effective among general undergraduate students performing a non-clinical contingency judgment task. Key words: clinical judgment; diagnosis; decision making. (Med Decis Making 8:216-222, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, 216-222 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800310


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mem CognitHome page
S. GLAUTIER
Recency and primacy in causal judgments: Effects of probe question and context switch on latent inhibition and extinction
Mem Cognit, September 1, 2008; 36(6): 1087 - 1093.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. R. Bergus, G. B. Chapman, B. T. Levy, J. W. Ely, and R. A. Oppliger
Clinical Diagnosis and the Order of Information
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 412 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]