Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tosteson, A. N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tosteson, A. N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, C. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A General Regression Methodology for ROC Curve Estimation

Anna N. Angelos Tosteson, MS

Colin B. Begg, PhD

A method for applying generalized ordinal regression models to categorical rating data to estimate and analyze receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves is presented. These models permit parsimonious adjustment of ROC curve parameters for relevant covariates through two regression equations that correspond to location and scale. Particular shapes of ROC curves are interpreted in relation to the kind of covariates included in the two regressions. The model is shown to be flexible because it is not restricted to the assumption of binormality that is commonly employed in smoothed ROC curve estimation, although the binormal model is one particular form of the more general model. The new method provides a mechanism for pinpointing the effect that interobserver variability has on the ROC curve. It also allows for the adjustment of ROC curves for temporal variation and case mix, and provides a way to assess the incremental diagnostic value of a test. The new methodology is recommended because it substantially improves the ability to assess diagnostic tests using ROC curves. Key words: ROC curves; ordinal regression; technology assessment; diagnostic tests. (Med Decis Making 8:204-215, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, 204-215 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800309


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. J. Fenton, S. H. Taplin, P. A. Carney, L. Abraham, E. A. Sickles, C. D'Orsi, E. A. Berns, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, W. E. Barlow, et al.
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2007; 356(14): 1399 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
R. M. Harbord, J. J. Deeks, M. Egger, P. Whiting, and J. A. C. Sterne
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
Biostat., April 1, 2007; 8(2): 239 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
B. Lozoff, N. Kaciroti, and T. Walter
Iron deficiency in infancy: applying a physiologic framework for prediction
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2006; 84(6): 1412 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, and J. G. Elmore
Accuracy of Screening Mammography Interpretation by Characteristics of Radiologists
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 2004; 96(24): 1840 - 1850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
W. B. van den Hout
The Area under an ROC Curve with Limited Information
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2003; 23(2): 160 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. E. Barlow, C. D. Lehman, Y. Zheng, R. Ballard-Barbash, B. C. Yankaskas, G. R. Cutter, P. A. Carney, B. M. Geller, R. Rosenberg, K. Kerlikowske, et al.
Performance of Diagnostic Mammography for Women With Signs or Symptoms of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 7, 2002; 94(15): 1151 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
S. J Meisels, D. D. Bickel, J. Nicholson, Y. Xue, and S. Atkins-Burnett
Trusting Teachers' Judgments: A Validity Study of a Curriculum-Embedded Performance Assessment in Kindergarten to Grade 3
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 2001; 38(1): 73 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Hellmich, K. R. Abrams, and A. J. Sutton
Bayesian Approaches to Meta-analysi of ROC Curves
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 252 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
D. E Shapiro
The interpretation of diagnostic tests
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 113 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. J. Walsh
Goodness-of-fit Issues in ROC Curve Estimation
Med Decis Making, April 1, 1999; 19(2): 193 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Hellmich, K. R. Abrams, D. R. Jones, and P. C. Lambert
A Bayesian Approach to a General Regression Model for ROC Curves
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
Fengchun Peng and W.J. Hall
Bayesian Analysis of ROC Curves Using Markov-chain Monte Carlo Methods
Med Decis Making, October 1, 1996; 16(4): 404 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. S. Midgette, T. A. Stukel, and B. Littenberg
A Meta-analytic Method for Summarizing Diagnostic Test Performances: Receiver-operating-characteristic - summary Point Estimates
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1993; 13(3): 253 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
K. M. McConnochie, K. J. Roghmann, and J. Pasternack
Developing Prediction Rules and Evaluating Observation Patterns Using Categorical Clinical Markers: Two Complementary Procedures
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1993; 13(1): 30 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. K. McClish
Combining and Comparing Area Estimates across Studies or Strata
Med Decis Making, December 1, 1992; 12(4): 274 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
A. Agresti
Modelling patterns of agreement and disagreement
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 1992; 1(2): 201 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. A. Diamond
Scotched on the ROCs
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 198 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. A. Hanley
Verification Bias and the One-parameter Logistic ROC Curve--Some Clarifications
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 203 - 207.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. G. Fryback and J. R. Thornbury
The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1991; 11(2): 88 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. H. Shmerling, T. L. Delbanco, A. N. A. Tosteson, and D. E. Trentham
Synovial Fluid Tests: What Should Be Ordered?
JAMA, August 22, 1990; 264(8): 1009 - 1014.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. G.M. Hunink, D. K. Richardson, P. M. Doubilet, and C. B. Begg
Testing for Fetal Pulmonary Maturity: ROC Analysis Involving Covariates, Verification Bias, and Combination Testing
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1990; 10(3): 201 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]