|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A General Regression Methodology for ROC Curve Estimation
Anna N. Angelos Tosteson, MS
Colin B. Begg, PhD
A method for applying generalized ordinal regression models to categorical rating data to estimate and analyze receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves is presented. These models permit parsimonious adjustment of ROC curve parameters for relevant covariates through two regression equations that correspond to location and scale. Particular shapes of ROC curves are interpreted in relation to the kind of covariates included in the two regressions. The model is shown to be flexible because it is not restricted to the assumption of binormality that is commonly employed in smoothed ROC curve estimation, although the binormal model is one particular form of the more general model. The new method provides a mechanism for pinpointing the effect that interobserver variability has on the ROC curve. It also allows for the adjustment of ROC curves for temporal variation and case mix, and provides a way to assess the incremental diagnostic value of a test. The new methodology is recommended because it substantially improves the ability to assess diagnostic tests using ROC curves. Key words: ROC curves; ordinal regression; technology assessment; diagnostic tests. (Med Decis Making 8:204-215, 1988)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3,
204-215 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800309

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Fenton, S. H. Taplin, P. A. Carney, L. Abraham, E. A. Sickles, C. D'Orsi, E. A. Berns, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, W. E. Barlow, et al.
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography
N. Engl. J. Med.,
April 5, 2007;
356(14):
1399 - 1409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Harbord, J. J. Deeks, M. Egger, P. Whiting, and J. A. C. Sterne
A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
Biostat.,
April 1, 2007;
8(2):
239 - 251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Lozoff, N. Kaciroti, and T. Walter
Iron deficiency in infancy: applying a physiologic framework for prediction
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
December 1, 2006;
84(6):
1412 - 1421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. E. Barlow, C. Chi, P. A. Carney, S. H. Taplin, C. D'Orsi, G. Cutter, R. E. Hendrick, and J. G. Elmore
Accuracy of Screening Mammography Interpretation by Characteristics of Radiologists
J Natl Cancer Inst,
December 15, 2004;
96(24):
1840 - 1850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. B. van den Hout
The Area under an ROC Curve with Limited Information
Med Decis Making,
March 1, 2003;
23(2):
160 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. E. Barlow, C. D. Lehman, Y. Zheng, R. Ballard-Barbash, B. C. Yankaskas, G. R. Cutter, P. A. Carney, B. M. Geller, R. Rosenberg, K. Kerlikowske, et al.
Performance of Diagnostic Mammography for Women With Signs or Symptoms of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst,
August 7, 2002;
94(15):
1151 - 1159.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J Meisels, D. D. Bickel, J. Nicholson, Y. Xue, and S. Atkins-Burnett
Trusting Teachers' Judgments: A Validity Study of a Curriculum-Embedded Performance Assessment in Kindergarten to Grade 3
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 2001;
38(1):
73 - 95.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hellmich, K. R. Abrams, and A. J. Sutton
Bayesian Approaches to Meta-analysi of ROC Curves
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1999;
19(3):
252 - 264.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E Shapiro
The interpretation of diagnostic tests
Statistical Methods in Medical Research,
April 1, 1999;
8(2):
113 - 134.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Walsh
Goodness-of-fit Issues in ROC Curve Estimation
Med Decis Making,
April 1, 1999;
19(2):
193 - 201.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hellmich, K. R. Abrams, D. R. Jones, and P. C. Lambert
A Bayesian Approach to a General Regression Model for ROC Curves
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 1998;
18(4):
436 - 443.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Fengchun Peng and W.J. Hall
Bayesian Analysis of ROC Curves Using Markov-chain Monte Carlo Methods
Med Decis Making,
October 1, 1996;
16(4):
404 - 411.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Midgette, T. A. Stukel, and B. Littenberg
A Meta-analytic Method for Summarizing Diagnostic Test Performances: Receiver-operating-characteristic - summary Point Estimates
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1993;
13(3):
253 - 257.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. McConnochie, K. J. Roghmann, and J. Pasternack
Developing Prediction Rules and Evaluating Observation Patterns Using Categorical Clinical Markers: Two Complementary Procedures
Med Decis Making,
February 1, 1993;
13(1):
30 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. McClish
Combining and Comparing Area Estimates across Studies or Strata
Med Decis Making,
December 1, 1992;
12(4):
274 - 279.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Agresti
Modelling patterns of agreement and disagreement
Statistical Methods in Medical Research,
August 1, 1992;
1(2):
201 - 218.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Diamond
Scotched on the ROCs
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1991;
11(3):
198 - 200.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Hanley
Verification Bias and the One-parameter Logistic ROC Curve--Some Clarifications
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1991;
11(3):
203 - 207.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Fryback and J. R. Thornbury
The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1991;
11(2):
88 - 94.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Shmerling, T. L. Delbanco, A. N. A. Tosteson, and D. E. Trentham
Synovial Fluid Tests: What Should Be Ordered?
JAMA,
August 22, 1990;
264(8):
1009 - 1014.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G.M. Hunink, D. K. Richardson, P. M. Doubilet, and C. B. Begg
Testing for Fetal Pulmonary Maturity: ROC Analysis Involving Covariates, Verification Bias, and Combination Testing
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1990;
10(3):
201 - 211.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|