Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schechter, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schechter, C. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sequential Analysis in a Bayesian Model of Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurement

Clyde B. Schechter, MD

A sequential method for diagnosing or excluding hypertension based on the Bayesian model of diastolic blood pressure presented in a companion article is presented. The likelihood ratio method of Wald is modified to include the effects of a prior probability distribution and to constrain the strategy to achieve specified positive and negative predictive values. The resulting formulas for upper and lower limits to diagnose and exclude diastolic hypertension can be evaluated using a hand calculator and a table of areas of the standard normal distribution. The strategy is illustrated for a population having a blood pressure distribution similar to that of the cohort screened for participation in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, with 90 mm Hg as the cutoff defining hypertension and required positive and negative predictive values of 95%. The performance of the strategy was simulated using Monte Carlo methods. The median number of readings required for diagnosis is three, and 80% of subjects are diagnosed in 11 or fewer readings. In contrast to the strategy's 95% predictive values, a fixed-number-of-measurements strategy requiring the same mean num ber of measurements has a positive predictive value of only 83% and a negative predictive value of 96%. When the parameters of the model have been properly measured or estimated, this method is practical, efficient, and accurate for diagnosing hypertension in a known population. Key words: Bayes' theorem; sequential analysis; hypertension diagnosis. (Med Decis Making 8:191-196, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, 191-196 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?