This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schechter, C. B. Articles by Adler, R. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schechter, C. B. Articles by Adler, R. S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Bayesian Analysis of Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurement

Rhodes S. Adler, MD

A mathematical model is presented for measurements that include substantial fluctuation and error. Under the assumptions that the fluctuation-error variance is the same for all subjects, and that the distributions of fluctuation-error variance within subjects and "true" values of the measurements in the population are normal, Bayes' theorem produces a simple estimate of the "true" value of a measurement, and a standard error, conditional on a single observation. The model is easily extended to several observations. Methods for estimating the parameters of the model from a data set are presented, and applied to diastolic blood pressures of patients in the authors' primary care clinic. The test-retest reliability of a single blood pressure measurement for this population is 0.41. Because continuous measurements are often dichotomized into "normal" and "abnormal" ranges by a threshold criterion, the authors present formulas for the positive predictive value when a decision rule based on a given number of observations is used in a population with respect to a threshold criterion for the "true" values. For example, classifying their patients as hypertensive on the basis of the average of two readings exceeding 90 mm Hg diastolic pressure would have a positive predictive value of 52% for the "gold standard" of average diastolic pressure exceeding 90 mm Hg. Formulas to calculate the frequency with which patients will be classified "abnormal" by one decision rule but will be classified "normal" by later application of another rule are provided and used to "predict" the frequency with which this crossover phenomenon should have occurred in the enrollment phase of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Pro grams.^5,6 The authors' calculation of 36.3% agrees closely with the observed 34.7% crossover rate, enhancing confidence in the validity of their model and generalizability of their parameter estimates. Key words: Bayes' theorem; hypertension; screening tests. (Med Decis Making 8:182-190, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, 182-190 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800306


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Mar, R. Pastor, R. Abasolo, and R. R. De Gauna Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Diagnostic Errors in Hypertension: A Bayesian Approach Med Decis Making, October 1, 1998; 18(4): 429 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. V. Philosophov Bayesian Decision Making Based on Measurements Containing Errors Med Decis Making, August 1, 1995; 15(3): 264 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Schechter Sequential Decision Making with Continuous Disease States and Measurements: I. Theory Med Decis Making, December 1, 1990; 10(4): 242 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Schechter Sequential Decision Making with Continuous Disease States and Measurements: II. Application to Diastolic Blood Pressure Med Decis Making, December 1, 1990; 10(4): 256 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Schechter Sequential Analysis in a Bayesian Model of Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurement Med Decis Making, August 1, 1988; 8(3): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]