This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Abrams, H. B. Articles by Wajda, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Abrams, H. B. Articles by Wajda, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Is There a Role for Surgery in the Acute Management of Infectiue Endocarditis?

A Decision Analysis and Medical Claims Database Approach

Allan S. Detsky, MD, PhD

Leslie L. Roos, JR., PhD

Andre Wajda, MSc

In the absence of good clinical evidence from a randomized trial, the authors performed a decision analysis to determine the potential value of early elective surgery (OPNOW) for patients with left-sided Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis. Initial impressions (before per formance of decision analysis) and initial runs at the formal models using probability estimates derived from clinicians suggested that OPNOW (i.e., within a few days of starting antibiotics) offered no advantage over attempted medical cure (WAIT) (life expectancy: WAIT = 325 weeks; OPNOW = 255 weeks). Extensive sensitivity analyses identified critical variables that needed further empirical estimation. The Manitoba Health Services Commission database identified 127 incident cases of endocarditis between April 1, 1979, and March 31, 1985, enabling estimation of values for these critical variables. With these estimates, the early surgery strategy appeared much better than the previous analyses had suggested (life expectancy: WAIT = 208 weeks, OPNOW = 256 weeks). The authors believe that this approach of com bining decision analysis with medical claims databases is useful as an alternative or precursor to randomized trials, especially where the resource requirements and logistic difficulties of performing randomized trials are great. Key words: infective endocarditis; valve replacement; therapy; databases. (Med Decis Making 8:165-174, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, 165-174 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Man-Son-Hing, A. Laupacis, A. M. O'Connor, D. Coyle, R. Berquist, and F. McAlister Patient Preference-based Treatment Thresholds and Recommendations: A Comparison of Decision-analytic Modeling with the Probability-tradeoff Technique Med Decis Making, October 1, 2000; 20(4): 394 - 402. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Naglie, M. D. Krahn, D. Naimark, D. A. Redelmeier, and A. S. Detsky Primer on Medical Decision Analysis: Part 3--Estimating Probabilities and Utilities Med Decis Making, April 1, 1997; 17(2): 136 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Wennberg Non-expepimental Methods in the Assessment of Ettieaey Med Decis Making, August 1, 1988; 8(3): 175 - 176. [PDF]