Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Elstein, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, B. P.
Right arrow Articles by Elstein, A. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Laboratory Tests
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Laboratory Use

Attitudes Implicit in a National Examination

Brian P. Schmitt, MD

Arthur S. Elstein, PhD

The quantitative principles of test selection and interpretation have been reluctantly integrated into clinical practice. This reluctance may reflect an underlying faculty attitude towards the laboratory. To evaluate this attitude, the scoring standards used for 23 patient management problems (PMPs) in the 1980 and 1983 Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Programs were reviewed. All diagnostic options were categorized by dollar cost, risk, and a determination of "routineness." Attitudes were probed by reviewing the scores obtained by indiscriminate selection of all items in a category. Our analysis indicated that the examiners valued routine, little-ticket, little-risk items. Such selection would be rewarded 85% of the time and in 95%, no penalty would be received. Further, indifference was more frequent for little-ticket items and accounted for 11.7% of acceptable diagnostic expense. An examinee analyzing these scoring keys could reasonably conclude that routine, little-ticket items should be ordered whenever offered. Hence, at a national level, there is an attitude that implicitly encourages the use of these items in clinical practice. Key words: attitudes; diagnostic tests. (Med Decis Making 8:81-86, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 2, 81-86 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. H. WOOLF and D. B. KAMEROW
Testing for Uncommon Conditions: The Heroic Search for Positive Test Results
Arch Intern Med, December 1, 1990; 150(12): 2451 - 2458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
B. P. Schmitt
Authors' Reply to Commentary To the Editor
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1988; 8(3): 224 - 225.
[PDF]