This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Diehr, P. Articles by Hermanson, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Diehr, P. Articles by Hermanson, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Prediction of Fracture in Patients with Acute MusculosKeletal Ankle Trauma

Robert Highley, MD MPH

Farideh Dehkordi, MS

Robert Wood, MD

Leigh Krueger, MPH

Carol Teitz, MD

Bonnie Hermanson, MS

X-rays taken for ankle trauma contribute significantly to the cost of health care in this country. In an attempt to find clinical correlates of ankle fracture 36 detailed historical and physical examination variables were collected from 587 consecutive patients with ankle trauma, and ankle x-rays were taken of all patients. The association of each variable with the final diagnosis of fracture, rupture, or sprain was tested; 21 variables were significant predictors of fracture (vs. sprain and rupture) and 15 were not significantly associated with final di agnosis. The variables were used in a linear discriminant analysis to develop a rule which would predict the final diagnosis. If only those patients predicted by the rule to have fractures had been x-rayed, all patients with fracture would have been identified but more than a fourth of all ankle trauma patients would have been spared x-rays. This compares favorably with a recently published rule that did not assess sensitivity. A simulated prospective evaluation suggests that these results are stable, but that up to 10% of the fractures could be missed on the first visit. Although current practice is not well documented, it appears that use of this rule could yield substantial cost savings. Key words: linear discriminant analysis; diagnosis; ankle trauma; fractures. (Med Decis Making 8:40-47, 1988)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 1, 40-47 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G.-R. Auleley, P. Ravaud, B. Giraudeau, L. Kerboull, R. Nizard, P. Massin, C. G. de Loubresse, C. Vallee, and P. Durieux Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in France: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, June 25, 1997; 277(24): 1935 - 1939. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. T. Chande Decision Rules for Roentgenography of Children With Acute Ankle Injuries Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1995; 149(3): 255 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. F. Raubertas, L. E. Rodewald, S. G. Humiston, and P. G. Szilagyi ROC Curves for Classification Trees Med Decis Making, April 1, 1994; 14(2): 169 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. G. Shell, G. H. Greenberg, R. D. McKnight, R. C. Nair, I. McDowell, M. Reardon, J. P. Stewart, and J. Maloney Decision Rules for the Use of Radiography in Acute Ankle Injuries: Refinement and Prospective Validation JAMA, March 3, 1993; 269(9): 1127 - 1132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. G.M. Hunink, D. K. Richardson, P. M. Doubilet, and C. B. Begg Testing for Fetal Pulmonary Maturity: ROC Analysis Involving Covariates, Verification Bias, and Combination Testing Med Decis Making, August 1, 1990; 10(3): 201 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]