|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Risk Preference and Laboratory Use
Stephen D. Nightingale, MD
One hundred thirty-seven physicians were asked to choose between a certain loss of five years of life expectancy and a 50/50 gamble of losing either ten years or zero years of life expectancy. These choices were presented as hypothetical options for a patient with cancer. The 46 who chose the certain loss ordered 23% fewer laboratory tests/patient visit in our General Medicine Clinic over an eight-week period than those who chose the gamble (p <0.05). This risk preference was further stratified by sequentially offering five, four, three, two, and one years of certain loss against the same 50/50 gamble of ten or zero years of loss; greater preference for the gamble correlated with greater laboratory use (p <0.002). To exclude physician knowledge or case mix as a cause of this result, this risk preference was correlated with total score, and with the cost of tests ordered in patient management problems, of 49 physicians on the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination. Cost of tests ordered was 23% less for the 17 who chose the certain loss (p <0.001 ); total score did not vary with risk preferences. There was no association between risk preference in the face of gain and laboratory use, and none between an individual's risk preferences in the face of gain and in the face of loss. The cognitive processes that determine risk preference in the face of loss, whatever they may be, appear to have a substantial influence on physician test-ordering behavior.
Key Words: Key words: risk preference • laboratory use. (Med Decis Making 7:168-173 • 1987)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 3,
168-172 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700307
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
L. A. Prosser, K. M. Kuntz, A. Bar-Or, and M. C. Weinstein
The Relationship between Risk Attitude and Treatment Choice in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Med Decis Making,
December 1, 2002;
22(6):
506 - 513.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Golub
Curbside Consultations and the Viaduct Effect
JAMA,
September 9, 1998;
280(10):
929 - 930.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Swensen, M. D. Silverstein, D. M. Ilstrup, C. D. Schleck, and E. S. Edell
The Probability of Malignancy in Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Application to Small Radiologically Indeterminate Nodules
Arch Intern Med,
April 28, 1997;
157(8):
849 - 855.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. Heckerling, T. G. Tape, and R. S. Wigton
Relation of Physicians' Predicted Probabilities of Pneumonia to Their Utilities for Ordering Chest X-rays to Detect Pneumonia
Med Decis Making,
February 1, 1992;
12(1):
32 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. R. Yarnold, S. D. Nightingale, R. H. Curry, and G. J. Martin
Psychological Androgyny and Preference in Loss-framed Gamhles of Medical Students: Possible Implications for Resource Utilization
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1991;
11(3):
176 - 179.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Holtgrave, F. Lawler, and S. J. Spann
Physicians' Risk Attitudes, Laboratory Usage, and Referral Decisions: The Case of an Academic family Practice Center
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1991;
11(2):
125 - 130.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. B. Deber and V. Goel
Using Explicit Decision Rules to Manage Issues of Justice, Risk, and Ethics in Decision Analysis: When Is It Not Rational to Maximize Expected Utility?
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1990;
10(3):
181 - 194.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Forrow, S. A. Wartman, and D. W. Brock
Science, Ethics, and the Making of Clinical Decisions: Implications for Risk Factor Intervention
JAMA,
June 3, 1988;
259(21):
3161 - 3167.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. F. Nease
Interpretation of "Life Expectancy": To the Editor
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1988;
8(2):
147 - 147.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorials
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1987;
7(3):
136 - 137.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
