This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Knottnerus, J.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Knottnerus, J.A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effects of Disease Verification and Referral on the Relationship Between Symptoms and Diseases

Reference symptoms of individual diseases, which are usually gleaned from hospital-based observations, may not be pertinent to primary health care. Observed relationships between symptoms and diseases can be biased by consultation, disease verification, and referral patterns. These biases are shown to affect sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, the likelihood ratio, and the odds ratio. On the assumption that consultation and disease veri fication rates are positively influenced by symptoms, but not directly by the yet unknown disease status of the patient, the general practitioner will observe a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity than in an unselected population. A positive correlation between symptom and disease will decrease the likelihood ratio, while the predictive values and the odds ratio are not changed after consultation. Referral is influenced by both symptom status and disease verification status. In general, the disease verification and referral patterns of general prac titioners have not been quantified. While the influence of referral cannot easily be corrected for, the likely magnitude and direction of selection bias can be evaluated using simple formulas. A possible way to make unbiased estimations from populations preselected by referral is to compute the predictive values and the odds ratio from the category of patients referred without pre-existing knowledge of the disease status.

Key Words: Key words: symptoms • dis eases • relationship • bias • referral. (Med Decis Making 7:139-148 • 1987)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 3, 139-148 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Nishikawa, Y. Imanaka, M. Sekimoto, K. Hayashida, and H. Ikai Influence of Verification Bias on the Assessment of MRI in the Diagnosis of Meniscal Tear Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1596 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M Bossuyt, J. B Reitsma, D. E Bruns, C. A Gatsonis, P. P Glasziou, L. M Irwig, J. G Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, and H. C. de Vet Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 4 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Bossuyt, J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. M. Irwig, J. G. Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. C.W. de Vet, et al. Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative Ann Intern Med, January 7, 2003; 138(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M Bossuyt, J. B Reitsma, D. E Bruns, C. A Gatsonis, P. P Glasziou, L. M Irwig, J. G Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, and H. C W de Vet Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative BMJ, January 4, 2003; 326(7379): 41 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Kotler and G. A. Diamond Exercise Thallium-201 Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1990; 113(9): 684 - 702. [Abstract] [PDF]