|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Workup Bias in Prediction Research
Robert J. Panzer
Anthony L. Suchman
Paul F. Griner
Studies often suggest that accepted clinical predictors actually have little predictive strength. One explanation for some such results is the presence of workup bias. To explore the effects of workup bias in prediction research, the authors modeled the effects of workup bias on the ability of early clinical findings to predict intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with stroke. In a simulated biased sample, workup bias resulted in distorted operating characteristics for those clinical findings influencing application of the "gold standard" and for other related findings. Sensitivity was increased, but both specificity and likelihood ratios were decreased in the biased sample. Workup bias can spuriously decrease predictive abilities for accepted clinical findings when such findings guide application of the "gold standard." Investigators should be aware of the potential effects of workup bias, search for clues to its occurrence, and interpret study results carefully when it is present. Key words: workup bias; prediction rules; stroke; intracerebral hemorrhage. (Med Decis Making 7:115-119, 1987)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2,
115-119 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700209

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Whiting, A. W.S. Rutjes, J. B. Reitsma, A. S. Glas, P. M.M. Bossuyt, and J. Kleijnen
Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: A Systematic Review
Ann Intern Med,
February 3, 2004;
140(3):
189 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M Bossuyt, J. B Reitsma, D. E Bruns, C. A Gatsonis, P. P Glasziou, L. M Irwig, J. G Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, and H. C. de Vet
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Fam. Pract.,
February 1, 2004;
21(1):
4 - 10.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Bossuyt, J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. M. Irwig, J. G. Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. C.W. de Vet, et al.
Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative
Ann Intern Med,
January 7, 2003;
138(1):
40 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M Bossuyt, J. B Reitsma, D. E Bruns, C. A Gatsonis, P. P Glasziou, L. M Irwig, J. G Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, and H. C W de Vet
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
BMJ,
January 4, 2003;
326(7379):
41 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M Fritz and R. S Wainner
Examining Diagnostic Tests: An Evidence-Based Perspective
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2001;
81(9):
1546 - 1564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Lijmer, B. W. Mol, S. Heisterkamp, G. J. Bonsel, M. H. Prins, J. H. P. van der Meulen, and P. M. M. Bossuyt
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
JAMA,
September 15, 1999;
282(11):
1061 - 1066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Hanley
Verification Bias and the One-parameter Logistic ROC Curve--Some Clarifications
Med Decis Making,
August 1, 1991;
11(3):
203 - 207.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Matchar, D. L. Simel, J. F. Geweke, and J. R. Feussner
A Bayesian Method for Evaluating Medical Test operating Characteristics When Some Patients' Conditions Fail to Be Diagnosed by the Reference Standard
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1990;
10(2):
102 - 111.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Diamond
ROCky III
Med Decis Making,
December 1, 1987;
7(4):
247 - 249.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|