Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panzer, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Griner, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panzer, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Griner, P. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*CT Scans
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Workup Bias in Prediction Research

Robert J. Panzer

Anthony L. Suchman

Paul F. Griner

Studies often suggest that accepted clinical predictors actually have little predictive strength. One explanation for some such results is the presence of workup bias. To explore the effects of workup bias in prediction research, the authors modeled the effects of workup bias on the ability of early clinical findings to predict intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with stroke. In a simulated biased sample, workup bias resulted in distorted operating characteristics for those clinical findings influencing application of the "gold standard" and for other related findings. Sensitivity was increased, but both specificity and likelihood ratios were decreased in the biased sample. Workup bias can spuriously decrease predictive abilities for accepted clinical findings when such findings guide application of the "gold standard." Investigators should be aware of the potential effects of workup bias, search for clues to its occurrence, and interpret study results carefully when it is present. Key words: workup bias; prediction rules; stroke; intracerebral hemorrhage. (Med Decis Making 7:115-119, 1987)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2, 115-119 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. Whiting, A. W.S. Rutjes, J. B. Reitsma, A. S. Glas, P. M.M. Bossuyt, and J. Kleijnen
Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: A Systematic Review
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2004; 140(3): 189 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
P. M Bossuyt, J. B Reitsma, D. E Bruns, C. A Gatsonis, P. P Glasziou, L. M Irwig, J. G Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, and H. C. de Vet
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Fam. Pract., February 1, 2004; 21(1): 4 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. M. Bossuyt, J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. M. Irwig, J. G. Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. C.W. de Vet, et al.
Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative
Ann Intern Med, January 7, 2003; 138(1): 40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. M Bossuyt, J. B Reitsma, D. E Bruns, C. A Gatsonis, P. P Glasziou, L. M Irwig, J. G Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, and H. C W de Vet
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
BMJ, January 4, 2003; 326(7379): 41 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Fritz and R. S Wainner
Examining Diagnostic Tests: An Evidence-Based Perspective
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2001; 81(9): 1546 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Lijmer, B. W. Mol, S. Heisterkamp, G. J. Bonsel, M. H. Prins, J. H. P. van der Meulen, and P. M. M. Bossuyt
Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests
JAMA, September 15, 1999; 282(11): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. A. Hanley
Verification Bias and the One-parameter Logistic ROC Curve--Some Clarifications
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 203 - 207.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. B. Matchar, D. L. Simel, J. F. Geweke, and J. R. Feussner
A Bayesian Method for Evaluating Medical Test operating Characteristics When Some Patients' Conditions Fail to Be Diagnosed by the Reference Standard
Med Decis Making, June 1, 1990; 10(2): 102 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. A. Diamond
ROCky III
Med Decis Making, December 1, 1987; 7(4): 247 - 249.
[PDF]