|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test Results
David L. Simel
John R. Feussner
Elizabeth R. Delong
David B. Matchar
Diagnostic tests do not always yield positive or negative results; sometimes the results are intermediate, indeterminate, or uninterpretable. No consensus exists for the incorporation of such results into data assessment. Conventional Bayesian analysis leads investigators to either exclude patients with non-positive, non-negative results from their studies or categorize such results into inappropriate cells of the standard four-cell decision matrix. The authors propose a standardized method for reporting results in studies dealing with diagnostic test use and discuss how researchers should expand the four-cell matrix to six cells when non- positive, non-negative results occur. They suggest that the six-cell matrix with new operational definitions of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and test yield should be adopted rou tinely. In addition, they define the different types of non-positive, non-negative results and demonstrate how clinicians can use tree-structured decision analysis from the six-cell matrix. While their method does not solve all problems posed by non-positive, non-negative results, it does suggest a standard method for reporting these results and utilizing all the data in decision making. Key words: diagnostic tests, Bayes theorem, decision analysis. (Med Decis Making 7:107-114, 1987)
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 2,
107-114 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8700700208
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. A. Kohn, J. Fahimi, T. B. Newman, H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, and R. D. Hull
Result Categories for Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy
Radiology,
November 1, 2009;
253(2):
575 - 576.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Gouya, O. Varenne, L. Trinquart, E. Touze, O. Vignaux, C. Spaulding, J.-L. Mas, and J.-L. Sablayrolles
Coronary Artery Stenosis in High-risk Patients: 64-Section CT and Coronary Angiography--Prospective Study and Analysis of Discordance
Radiology,
August 1, 2009;
252(2):
377 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. D. Sostman, M. Miniati, A. Gottschalk, F. Matta, P. D. Stein, and M. Pistolesi
Sensitivity and Specificity of Perfusion Scintigraphy Combined with Chest Radiography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in PIOPED II
J. Nucl. Med.,
November 1, 2008;
49(11):
1741 - 1748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.-C. Pouleur, J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, J. Kefer, A. Pasquet, J.-L. Vanoverschelde, and B. L. Gerber
Direct Comparison of Whole-Heart Navigator-Gated Magnetic Resonance Coronary Angiography and 40- and 64-Slice Multidetector Row Computed Tomography to Detect the Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients Scheduled for Conventional Coronary Angiography
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging,
September 1, 2008;
1(2):
114 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Dewey, D. Oncel, G. Oncel, and A. Tastan
Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Radiology,
August 1, 2008;
248(2):
701 - 702.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Dewey, H.-P. Dubel, T. Schink, G. Baumann, and B. Hamm
Head-to-head comparison of multislice computed tomography and exercise electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease
Eur. Heart J.,
October 2, 2007;
28(20):
2485 - 2490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Dewey, F. Teige, D. Schnapauff, M. Laule, A. C. Borges, K.-D. Wernecke, T. Schink, G. Baumann, W. Rutsch, P. Rogalla, et al.
Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Ann Intern Med,
September 19, 2006;
145(6):
407 - 415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. G. Fowler Jr, K. S. Kaye, D. L. Simel, C. H. Cabell, D. McClachlan, P. K. Smith, S. Levin, D. J. Sexton, L. B. Reller, G. R. Corey, et al.
Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia After Median Sternotomy: Clinical Utility of Blood Culture Results in the Identification of Postoperative Mediastinitis
Circulation,
July 8, 2003;
108(1):
73 - 78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Bossuyt, J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. M. Irwig, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. C.W. de Vet, and J. G. Lijmer
The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
Ann Intern Med,
January 7, 2003;
138(1):
W1 - W12.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G. Badgett, C. R. Lucey, and C. D. Mulrow
Can the Clinical Examination Diagnose Left-Sided Heart Failure in Adults?
JAMA,
June 4, 1997;
277(21):
1712 - 1719.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Cook and D. L. Simel
Does This Patient Have Abnormal Central Venous Pressure?
JAMA,
February 28, 1996;
275(8):
630 - 634.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Reid, M. S. Lachs, and A. R. Feinstein
Use of Methodological Standards in Diagnostic Test Research: Getting Better but Still Not Good
JAMA,
August 23, 1995;
274(8):
645 - 651.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Williams Jr and D. L. Simel
Does This Patient Have Sinusitis? Diagnosing Acute Sinusitis by History and Physical Examination
JAMA,
September 8, 1993;
270(10):
1242 - 1246.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Williams Jr, D. L. Simel, L. Roberts, and G. P. Samsa
Clinical Evaluation for Sinusitis: Making the Diagnosis by History and Physical Examination
Ann Intern Med,
November 1, 1992;
117(9):
705 - 710.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Beck
Decision-making Studies in Patient Management: Twenty Years Later
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1991;
11(2):
112 - 115.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Matchar, D. L. Simel, J. F. Geweke, and J. R. Feussner
A Bayesian Method for Evaluating Medical Test operating Characteristics When Some Patients' Conditions Fail to Be Diagnosed by the Reference Standard
Med Decis Making,
June 1, 1990;
10(2):
102 - 111.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
