This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ohmann, C. Articles by Lorenz, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ohmann, C. Articles by Lorenz, W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: Assessing the Diagnostic Contributions of the History and Clinical Findings

Klaus Thon, MD

Hartmut Stöltzing, MD

Qin Yang

Wilfried Lorenz, MD

Various strategies can be used in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. This study investigates the relevance of anamnestic and clinical findings for the diagnosis of the bleeding source. The authors introduced a computer-aided diagnostic system using Bayes' theorem and compared it with clinicians' predictions using anamnestic and clinical findings only. There was no difference in the overall accuracy rates, but a difference was observed in the diagnostic behaviors of the two "systems." In addition, the discriminatory ability of the computer-aided system, the sharpness of the predictions obtained, and the reliability of the posterior probabilities were analyzed. It is concluded that the clinician and the computer- aided system are not able to discriminate well between the disease categories. Derived classification matrices and probability-based measures show the reasons for the inadequacy of diagnostic information obtainable from the clinical history and physical findings. Key words: computer-aided diagnosis; Bayes' theorem; probabilistic diagnosis; discriminatory ability; reliability; clinical accuracy; upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. (Med Decis Making 6:208- 215, 1986)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 6, No. 4, 208-215 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8600600405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?