This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wigton, R. S. Articles by Patil, K. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wigton, R. S. Articles by Patil, K. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB OXYGEN Medline Plus Health Information Pulmonary Embolism Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

How Physicians Use Clinical Information in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism

An Application of Conjoint Analysis

Vincent L. Hoellerich, MD

Kashinath D. Patil, PhD

To investigate what diagnostic strategies physicians adopt when the literature is unclear about the best use of diagnostic information, the authors examined how physicians weighted eight items of clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Thirteen faculty mem bers, 23 house officers, and 19 students estimated the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and predicted whether they would begin treatment in 27 simulated cases. The vignettes were constructed using a fractional factorial design and analyzed using conjoint analysis. Overall the lung scan results (34.7%) and leg examination (19.0%) were weighted most heavily in making the diagnosis, whereas the leg examination (35.7%) was given the greatest weight when deciding about therapy. Weights given by groups at different levels of training were similar, but there was considerable variation within groups. Heterogeneity of diagnostic strategies did not appear to decrease in groups with more training and experience. Multi variate analysis of predictors of pulmonary embolism in 102 actual cases showed that al though lung scan results were important in both actual and simulated cases, heart rate accounted for the most variance in the actual cases but was hardly used in the physicians' strategies. There is considerable variation among physicians in how clinical information is used in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and the variation may not decrease with increased experience. Key words: conjoint analysis, clinical diagnosis, diagnostic strategies, pulmonary embolism. (Med Decis Making 6:2-11, 1986)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2-11 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8600600102


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Wahlstrom, E. Hummers-Pradier, C. S. Lundborg, M. Muskova, P. Lagerlov, P. Denig, T. Oke, and D M. C. de Saintonge Variations in asthma treatment in five European countries--judgement analysis of case simulations Fam. Pract., October 1, 2002; 19(5): 452 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Kee, C. C. Patterson, A. E. Wilson, J. M. McConnell, S. M. Wheeler, and J. D. Watson Judgment Analysis of Prioritization Decisions within a Dialysis Program in One United Kingdom Region Med Decis Making, April 1, 2002; 22(2): 140 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Knutsson, L. Lysell, and M. Rohlin Dentists' Judgment Strategies on Prophylactic Removal of Mandibular Third Molars Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 2000; 79(12): 1989 - 1995. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Diamond, D. H. Ruth, F. W. Markham, H. K. Rabinowitz, and M. P. Rosenthal Specialty Selections of Jefferson Medical College Students: A Conjoint Analysis Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1994; 17(3): 322 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. V. Dawson, A. F. Connors, T. Speroff, A. Kemka, P. Shaw, and H. R. Arkes Hemodynamic Assessment in Managing the Critically III: Is Physician Confidence Warranted? Med Decis Making, August 1, 1993; 13(3): 258 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. G. Tape, P. S. Heckerling, J. P. Ornato, and R. S. Wigton Use of Clinical Judgment Analysis to Explain Regional Variations in Physicians' Accuracies in Diagnosing Pneumonia Med Decis Making, August 1, 1991; 11(3): 189 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. V. Dawson and R. D. Cebul Advances in Quantitative Techniques for Making Medical Decisions: The Last Decade Eval Health Prof, March 1, 1990; 13(1): 37 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Engel, R. Wigton, A. LaDuca, and R. S. Blacklow A Social Judgment Theory Perspective On Clinical Problem Solving Eval Health Prof, March 1, 1990; 13(1): 63 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Wigton Use of Linear Models to Analyze Physicians' Decisions Med Decis Making, December 1, 1988; 8(4): 241 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Holmes and M. L. Rothert On Estending Judgment Analysis to Clinical Trials Med Decis Making, February 1, 1988; 8(1): 39 - 39. [PDF]

				D. G. Smith and R. S. Wigton Modeling Decisions to Use Tube Feeding in Seriously Ill Patients Arch Intern Med, July 1, 1987; 147(7): 1242 - 1245. [Abstract] [PDF]