Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X09347013v1
29/5/E30    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bossuyt, P. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McCaffery, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bossuyt, P. M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McCaffery, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Additional Patient Outcomes and Pathways in Evaluations of Testing

Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, PhD

Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, p.m.bossuyt{at}amc.uva.nl

Kirsten McCaffery, PhD

Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia

Before medical tests are introduced into practice, they should be properly evaluated. Randomized trials and other comprehensive evaluations of tests and test strategies can best be designed based on an understanding of how tests can benefit or harm patients. Tests primarily affect patients’ health by guiding clinical decision making and downstream management, such as the decision to order more tests or to start, stop, or modify treatment. In this article, the authors demonstrate that tests can have additional effects on patient outcome, which may be cognitive, emotional, social, or behavioral. They present a framework to help researchers and policy makers consider the cognitive, emotional, social, and behavioral effects of testing. These additional effects may be important themselves and may also influence the clinical outcomes of testing through different pathways. The authors provide examples from test evaluations in the literature to illustrate how these additional effects can be important in the evaluation of testing or indeed any health intervention.

Key Words: diagnostic test evaluation • clinical research methodology • randomized trial methodology • quality of life. (Med Decis Making 2009;29:E30—E38)

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 5, E30-E38 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09347013


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
M. Helfand
Web Exclusive White Paper Series on Diagnostic Test Evaluation
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 634 - 635.
[PDF]