Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X09333120v1
29/4/468    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montori, V. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montori, V. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Should Clinicians Deliver Decision Aids? Further Exploration of the Statin Choice Randomized Trial Results

Lesley A. Jones, MD

Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Audrey J. Weymiller, CNP

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Nilay Shah, PhD

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, Division of Health Care Research and Policy, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Sandra C. Bryant, MS

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Teresa J. H. Christianson, BS

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Amiram Gafni, PhD

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Steven A. Smith, MD

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, Division of Health Care Research and Policy, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Victor M. Montori, MD, MSc

Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, kerunit{at}mayo.edu

Background. Statin Choice is a decision aid about taking statins. The optimal mode of delivering Statin Choice (or any other decision aid) in clinical practice is unknown. Methods. To investigate the effect of mode of delivery on decision aid efficacy, the authors further explored the results of a concealed 2 x 2 factorial clustered randomized trial enrolling 21 endocrinologists and 98 diabetes patients and randomizing them to 1) receive either the decision aid or pamphlet about cholesterol, and 2) have these delivered either during the office visit (by the clinician) or before the visit (by a researcher). We estimated between-group differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for acceptability of information delivery (1—7), knowledge about statins and coronary risk (0—9), and decisional conflict about statin use (0—100) assessed immediately after the visit. Follow-up was 99%. Results. The relative efficacy of the decision aid v. pamphlet interacted with the mode of delivery. Compared with the pamphlet, patients whose clinicians delivered the decision aid during the office visit showed significant improvements in knowledge (difference of 1.6 of 9 questions, CI 0.3, 2.8) and nonsignificant trends toward finding the decision aid more acceptable (odds ratio 3.1, CI 0.9, 11.2) and having less decisional conflict (difference of 7 of 100 points, CI -4, 18) than when a researcher delivered the decision aid just before the office visit. Conclusions. Delivery of decision aids by clinicians during the visit improves knowledge and shows a trend toward better acceptability and less decisional conflict.

Key Words: decision making • patient-provider communication • decision aids • patient participation.

This version was published on July 1, 2009

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 4, 468-474 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09333120


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. Fagerlin
Getting Down to Details in the Design and Use of Decision Aids
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2009; 29(4): 409 - 411.
[PDF]