Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X09341389v1
29/4/424    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hupert, N.
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hupert, N.
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Predicting Hospital Surge after a Large-Scale Anthrax Attack: A Model-Based Analysis of CDC's Cities Readiness Initiative Prophylaxis Recommendations

Nathaniel Hupert, MD, MPH

Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, nah2005{at}med.cornell.edu, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York

Daniel Wattson, BS

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Jason Cuomo, MPH

Operation USA, Culver City, California

Eric Hollingsworth, BS

Google, Mountain View, California

Kristof Neukermans, BA, MBA

Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York

Wei Xiong, PhD

Department of Public Health, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York

Background . After a major bioterrorism attack, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cities Readiness Initiative (CRI) calls for dispensing of medical countermeasures to targeted populations within 48 hours. The authors explore how meeting or missing this 48-hour goal after a hypothetical aerosol anthrax attack would affect hospital surge, in light of the multiple uncertainties surrounding anthrax-related illness and response. Design . The authors created a discrete-time state transition computer model representing the dynamic interaction between disease progression of inhalational anthrax and the rate of dispensing of prophylactic antibiotics in an exposed population. Results. A CRI-compliant prophylaxis campaign starting 2 days after exposure would protect from 86% to 87% of exposed individuals from illness (assuming, in the base case, 90% antibiotic effectiveness and a 95% attack rate). Each additional day needed to complete the campaign would result in, on average, 2.4% to 2.9% more hospitalizations in the exposed population; each additional day's delay to initiating prophylaxis beyond 2 days would result in 5.2% to 6.5% additional hospitalizations. These population protection estimates vary roughly proportionally to antibiotic effectiveness but are relatively insensitive to variations in anthrax incubation period. Conclusion. Delays in detecting and initiating response to large-scale, covert aerosol anthrax releases in a major city would render even highly effective CRI-compliant mass prophylaxis campaigns unable to prevent unsustainable levels of surge hospitalizations. Although outcomes may improve with more rapid epidemiological identification of affected subpopulations and increased collaboration across regional public health and hospital systems, these findings support an increased focus on prevention of this public health threat.

Key Words: anthrax • emergency preparedness • antibiotic prophylaxis • hospital bed capacity • models • decision support • models • theoretical.

This version was published on July 1, 2009

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 4, 424-437 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09341389


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
dmphpHome page
N. Hupert, W. Xiong, K. King, M. Castorena, C. Hawkins, C. Wu, and J. A. Muckstadt
Uncertainty and Operational Considerations in Mass Prophylaxis Workforce Planning
Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness, December 1, 2009; 3(Supplement_2): S121 - S131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
G. D. Sanders
Modeling Bioterrorism and Disaster Preparedness: SMDM's Recommendations for Design and Reporting
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2009; 29(4): 412 - 413.
[PDF]