This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0272989X08323298v1 29/1/91    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hansen, R. A. Articles by Gaynes, B. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hansen, R. A. Articles by Gaynes, B. N. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Controlling for Drug Dose in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Case Study of the Effect of Antidepressant Dose

University of North Carolina-School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, rahansen{at}unc.edu

Charity G. Moore, PhD

University of Pittsburgh-School of Medicine

Stacie B. Dusetzina, BA

University of North Carolina-School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill

Brian I. Leinwand, MSPH

University of North Carolina-School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill

Gerald Gartlehner, MD, MPH

Department for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-based Medicine, Danube University, Krems, Austria

Bradley N. Gaynes, MD, MPH

University of North Carolina-School of Medicine, Chapel Hill

Purpose . To describe a method for quantitatively dealing with drug dose in comparative effectiveness reviews. Second-generation antidepressants are used as an example to illustrate this method and to determine whether dose influences conclusions on comparative effectiveness. Methods. Studies previously identified in a systematic review of second-generation antidepressants were included if data on drug dose were available. The usual dosing range for each drug was defined and then used to create 2- and 3-level dose categories. Placebo-controlled data were used to calculate overall effect sizes for the drug class and effect sizes stratified by drug dose. Meta-regression tested the impact of dose on effect size. Weighted mean differences and risk ratios were calculated for comparative studies, stratifying by whether compared doses were equivalent. Results. The dose classification method was able to identify dose-response trends in the context of meta-analysis. Compared to low-dose studies, medium- and high-dose studies had a 1- to 2-point greater differential in mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) change (P < 0:001). Dose was not a statistically significant predictor of categorical HAM-D response. Among comparative trials with nonequivalent doses, trends favored higher dose categories but generally were not statistically significant. Conclusions. A structured method for quantitatively dealing with drug dose in comparative effectiveness reviews is described, with application to the second-generation antidepressants. Dose-dependent reductions in HAM-D scores were identified, although differences did not translate into better response rates for higher doses. Dose equivalency was not a significant factor among comparative studies in second-generation antidepressants.

Key Words: meta-analysis • meta-regression • dose • dose-response • comparative effectiveness. (Med Decis Making 2009;29:91—103)

This version was published on January 1, 2009

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 1, 91-103 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08323298


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?