This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0272989X08322012v1 29/1/82    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Koffijberg, H. Articles by Buskens, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koffijberg, H. Articles by Buskens, E. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Brain Aneurysm Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do Intraindividual Variation in Disease Progression and the Ensuing Tight Window of Opportunity Affect Estimation of Screening Benefits?

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, h.koffijberg{at}umcutrecht.nl

Gabriel Rinkel, MD

Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Erik Buskens, PhD, MD

Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Background . The effects of variation in disease progression between individuals on the effectiveness of screening have been assessed extensively in the literature. For several diseases, progression may also vary within individuals over time. The authors study the effects of intraindividual variation and the combined effects of inter- and intraindividual variation in disease progression on the effectiveness of screening. Methods. The authors investigated the risk reduction of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) achieved by screening for intracranial aneurysms in a simulation study as a function of the inter- and intraindividual variation in the risk of aneurysm rupture. They also extended a previously constructed Markov model for the cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for new aneurysms in patients with clipped aneurysms after SAH. A time-varying risk of aneurysm rupture was introduced, and the influence of this variation on cost-effectiveness was assessed. Results. The risk reduction provided by screening decreased with increasing intraindividual variation in disease progression. The expected number of prevented instances of SAH was overestimated by 58% in this simulation study when high degrees of inter- and intraindividual variation were present. Interindividual variation alone resulted in up to 33% overestimation and intraindividual variation in up to 43% overestimation. In the extended Markov model, screening benefits were overestimated by 24% when a high degree of intraindividual variation was present but ignored. Conclusions. If intraindividual variation in disease progression is ignored in decision models, subsequent cost-effectiveness analyses of screening strategies will overestimate the benefits provided by screening. This bias is comparable to, but partially independent of, the bias caused by ignoring interindividual heterogeneity.

Key Words: Key words: disease progression • heterogeneity • cost-effectiveness analysis • simulation. (Med Decis Making 2009;29:82—90)

This version was published on January 1, 2009

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 1, 82-90 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08322012


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?