Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X08322010v1
29/1/7    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tsevat, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khanna, D.
Right arrow Articles by Tsevat, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Randomized Study of Scleroderma Health State Values: A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, and Quite a Few Utilities

Dinesh Khanna, MD, MS

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, dkhanna{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Robert M. Kaplan, PhD

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Mark H. Eckman, MD, MS

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Ron D. Hays, PhD

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, RAND, Santa Monica, CA

Anthony C. Leonard, PhD

Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Shaari S. Ginsburg, BA

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Joel Tsevat, MD, MPH

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Objective. Assigning utilities to hypothetical health states requires that the health states be described in adequate detail, but there is no agreement on exactly how health states should be described. We assess utilities from the general public for health states common in scleroderma (SSc) by describing the health states in writing alone v. with photographs of patients with SSc. Methods. Subjects rated several SSc health states on a 0 to 100 rating scale (RS) and completed computer-assisted time tradeoff (TTO; range, 0.01.0) and standard gamble (SG; range, 0.01.0) assessments. Half of the subjects were assigned to be shown photographs of patients with SSc health states in addition to written health state descriptions, whereas the other half were given only the written descriptions. Results. Of the 213 participants, 133 (62%) were female, 138 (65%) were Caucasian, and 62 (29%) were African American. Median RS, TTO, and SG scores for 5 SSc health states ranged from 20 to 70, 0.28 to 0.94, and 0.50 to 0.90, respectively. In bivariate analyses, showing pictures was associated with lower RS scores for 2 of 5 health states and lower SG values for all 5 health states (P < 0:05 for comparison of pictures v. no pictures), but with no difference in TTO values. Multivariable analyses revealed negative associations between pictures and SG valuations for the 3 most severe SSc health states (R2 range, 0.040.08). Conclusion. Adding pictures of people with SSc to written health state descriptions can affect valuations of SSc health states, although the effect differs by valuation measurement method and by health state severity.

Key Words: Key words: scleroderma • utility assessment • quality of life • measurement methods. (Med Decis Making 2009 • 29:7—14)

This version was published on January 1, 2009

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 29, No. 1, 7-14 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08322010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?