Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X07312712v1
28/3/385    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudak, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Levinson, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudak, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Levinson, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do Patients' Communication Behaviors Provide Insight into Their Preferences for Participation in Decision Making?

Pamela L. Hudak, BScPT, PhD

Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto ON, Canada, M5B 1W8, hudakp{at}smh.toronto.on.ca

Richard M. Frankel, PhD

Richard L. Roudebush Veteran's Administration Medical Centre, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana

Clarence Braddock, III, MD, MPH

Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

Rosane Nisenbaum, PhD

Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Paola Luca, HBSc

School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Caitlin McKeever, BA

Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Wendy Levinson, MD, FRCPC

Department of Medicine, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Background. The Institute of Medicine report "Crossing the Quality Chasm'' encourages physicians to tailor their approaches to care according to each patient's individual preferences for participation in decision making. How physicians should determine these preferences is unclear. Objective. The objective of this study is to assess whether judgments of patient communication behaviors, either globally or individually, can yield insight into patient preferences for participation in decision making. Methods. Using questionnaire responses to 3 items about the desired level of participation in decision making from a communication study involving 886 audiotaped visits between older patients and surgeons, the authors purposively selected 25 patients who preferred a large role and 25 who preferred a small role in decision making. Two independent raters listened to the audiotapes and coded them for the presence of 7 communication behaviors (question asking, information behavior, initiating, statements of preference, processing, resistance, deference). On the basis of their listening and coding, raters judged patient preferences for participation in decision making. Results. Neither rater accurately judged preferences for participation in decision making beyond chance agreement (kappa statistics: rater 1 = 0.16, rater 2 = 0.20). Inter-rater reliability for the communication behaviors was also generally poor. Area-under-the-curve values for all communication behaviors hovered around 0.50, indicating that none of the behaviors had adequate power to discriminate between patients preferring large versus small roles. Conclusion. Patient preferences for participation in decision making cannot be reliably judged during routine visits based on judgments of patient communication behaviors. Engaging patients in a discussion of preferences for decision making may be the best way to determine the role each wants to play in any given decision.

Key Words: patient preferences for participation in decision making • communication behaviors.

This version was published on June 1, 2008

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 28, No. 3, 385-393 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07312712


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?