Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0272989X08317011v1
28/3/351    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doctor, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doctor, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
This version was published on June 1, 2008
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 28, No. 3, 351-358 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X08317011

Time-Tradeoff Utilities for Identifying and Evaluating a Minimum Data Set for Time-Critical Biosurveillance

Jason N. Doctor, PhD

Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, jdoctor{at}usc.edu, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Janet G. Baseman, PhD

Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

William B. Lober, MD

Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Jac Davies, MS, MPH

Inland Northwest Health Services, Spokane Washington, Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

John Kobayashi, MD, MPH

Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Bryant T. Karras, MD

Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Sherrilynne Fuller, PhD

Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Center for Public Health Informatics, School of Public Health & Community Medicine, Seattle, Washington

Background. Researchers and policy makers are interested in identifying, implementing, and evaluating a national minimum data set for biosurveillance. However, work remains to be done to establish methods for measuring the value of such data. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to establish and evaluate a method for measuring the utility of biosurveillance data. Method. The authors derive an expected utility model in which the value of data may be determined by trading data relevance for time delay in receiving data. In a sample of 23 disease surveillance practitioners, the authors test if such tradeoffs are sensitive to the types of data elements involved (chief complaint v. emergency department [ED] log of visit) and proportional changes to the time horizon needed for receiving data (24 v. 48 h). In addition, they evaluate the logical error rate: the proportion of responses that scored less relevant data as having higher utility. Results. Utilities of chief complaints were significantly higher than ED log of visit, F(1, 21)= 5.60, P < 0.05, suggesting the method is sensitive. Further utilities did not depend on time horizon used in the exercise, F(1, 21) = 0.00, P = ns. Of 92 time tradeoffs elicited, there were 5 logical errors (i.e., 5% logical error rate). Conclusions. In this article, the authors establish a time-tradeoff exercise for valuing biosurveillance data. Empirically, the method shows initial promise for evaluating a minimum data set for biosurveillance. Future applications of this approach may prove useful in disease surveillance planning and evaluation.

Key Words: utility theory • public health • bioterrorism • epidemiology • surveillance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?