This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 0272989X07305323v1 27/6/754    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van der Weijden, T. Articles by Grol, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van der Weijden, T. Articles by Grol, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in General Practice: Mismatch between Cardiovascular Risk and Patients' Risk Perceptions

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Trudy.vanderWeijden{at}hag.unimaas.nl

B. van Steenkiste

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

H.E.J.H. Stoffers, PhD, MD

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

D.R.M. Timmermans, PhD

Department of Social Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

R. Grol, PhD

Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Objective. Guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) emphasize identifying high-risk patients for more intensive management, but patients' misconceptions of risk hamper implementation. Insight is needed into the type of patients that general practitioners (GPs) encounter in their cardiovascular prevention activities. How appropriate are the risk perceptions and worries of patients with whom GPs discuss CVD risks? What determines inappropriate risk perception? Method. Cross-sectional study in 34 general practices. The study included patients aged 40 to 70 years with whom CVD risk was discussed during consultation. After the consultation, the GPs completed a registration form, and patients completed a questionnaire. Correlations between patients' actual CVD risk and risk perceptions were analyzed. Results. In total, 490 patients were included. In 17% of the consultations, patients were actually at high risk. Risk was perceived inappropriately by nearly 4 in 5 high-risk patients (incorrect optimism) and by 1 in 5 low-risk patients (incorrect pessimism). Smoking, hypertension, and obesity were determinants of perceiving CVD risk as high, whereas surprisingly, diabetic patients did not report any anxiety about their CVD risk. Men were more likely to perceive their CVD risk inappropriately than women. Conclusion. In communicating CVD risk, GPs must be aware that they mostly encounter low-risk patients and that the perceived risk and worry do not necessarily correspond with the actual risk. Incorrect perceptions of CVD risk among men and patients with diabetes were striking.

Key Words: primary prevention • cardiovascular diseases • risk tables • risk score sheet • risk communication • risk perception.

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 6, 754-761 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07305323


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Terre Advancing the Prevention and Control of Hypertension American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, November 1, 2009; 3(6): 450 - 453. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Acheson In this issue: community care, healing, and excellence in research. Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2008; 6(4): 290 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF]