This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 0272989X07306784v1 27/5/533    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fraenkel, L. Articles by McGraw, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fraenkel, L. Articles by McGraw, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Participation in Medical Decision Making: The Patients' Perspective

VA Connecticut Healthcare System and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, liana.fraenkel{at}yale.edu

Sarah McGraw, PhD

New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts

Purpose. Variability in reports of patients' preferences to participate in decision making may be due in part to a lack of understanding about how patients conceptualize their participation. The authors sought to learn more about how patients view their involvement in decisions related to their health care. Methods. The authors conducted individual interviews to allow patients to frame the decision-making process from their own perspective. The constant comparative-method approach to analysis was employed to ensure that the analysts defined the codes in a consistent manner. Results. Twenty-six persons were interviewed. The main themes discussed by the participants reflecting how they viewed their involvement in medical decision making are the following: 1) decision making is often an ongoing process in which patient participation may change over time, 2) decision making is performed within an extended social context, 3) the decisions patients report being involved in are often distinct from those traditionally studied (choice of treatment or screening strategies), 4) patient involvement in decision making occurs in response to physicians' recommendations, and 5) patients make choices in the context of their specific illness perceptions. Conclusions. Participants in this study view their participation in decision making as including ideas distinct from those traditionally discussed by researchers. These findings suggest that the variability in patient participation noted in previous studies may be due in part to limitations in study design.

Key Words: Key words: medical decision making • qualitative study • patient participation. (Med Decis Making 2007;27:533—538)

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 5, 533-538 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07306784


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Brezis, S. Israel, A. Weinstein-Birenshtock, P. Pogoda, A. Sharon, and R. Tauber Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 20(5): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]