This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 0272989X07306782v1 27/5/522    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kremer, H. Articles by Hautzinger, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kremer, H. Articles by Hautzinger, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service Family Issues Talking With Your Doctor Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

``It's My Body'': Does Patient Involvement in Decision Making Reduce Decisional Conflict?

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA, HeidemarieKremer{at}yahoo.de

Gail Ironson, MD, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA

Neil Schneiderman, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA

Martin Hautzinger, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Germany

Objective. This study explores how much people with HIV/AIDS wanted and how much they actually perceived being involved in the decision to take or not to take antiretroviral treatment (ART). The congruence between desired and perceived decisional involvement was also related to decisional conflict. Method. Cross-sectional (N = 79), the Control Preferences Scale assessed patients' preferred versus perceived role in treatment decision making. The Decisional Conflict Scale measured patients' perceived difficulties in decision making. Results. Although a minority of patients (32%) perceived their role as shared decision making, the majority (59%) preferred shared decision making. Some did not desire shared decision making, with 28% preferring to decide on their own versus 13% wanting their physicians to decide for them. Overall, 58% did not feel they had achieved their desired role in decision making (half of whom perceived more control and the other half less control than preferred). Participants declining ART felt more pressure to decide alone compared with those taking ART (P < 0.01). Decisional conflict was expressed by 53% and was highest when physicians unilaterally made decisions about ART for patients who preferred shared decision making (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In this study, most physicians do not meet their patients' desired roles in decision making. One-third of people taking ART feel less involved than they desire. More critically, half of those declining ART feel pressured to decide alone, suggesting that physicians should remain involved in the decision to reject treatment, as this requires careful monitoring and periodical revisiting. Because lack of shared decision making is related to decisional conflict, physicians may reduce decisional conflict by meeting patients' desires for shared decision making.

Key Words: Key words: HIV/AIDS • antiretroviral treatment • patient involvement • decision making • decisional conflict • patient—physician relationship. (Med Decis Making 2007;27:522—532)

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 5, 522-532 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07306782


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. Caoili, R. H. Cohan, J. H. Ellis, J. Dillman, M. J. Schipper, and I. R. Francis Medical Decision Making Regarding Computed Tomographic Radiation Dose and Associated Risk: The Patient's Perspective Arch Intern Med, June 8, 2009; 169(11): 1069 - 1071. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brezis, S. Israel, A. Weinstein-Birenshtock, P. Pogoda, A. Sharon, and R. Tauber Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 20(5): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Hanson Shared Decision Making: Have We Missed the Obvious? Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2008; 168(13): 1368 - 1370. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Street JR Aiding Medical Decision Making: A Communication Perspective Med Decis Making, October 1, 2007; 27(5): 550 - 553. [PDF]