This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Krabbe, P. F. M. Articles by Murray, C. J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krabbe, P. F. M. Articles by Murray, C. J. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Quantification of Health States with Rank-Based Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling

Department of Medical Technology Assessment (138), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, p.krabbe{at}mta.umcn.nl

Joshua A. Salomon, PhD

Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Harvard Initiative for Global Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Christopher J. L. Murray, MD, PhD

Department of Population and International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Harvard Initiative for Global Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Objectives. An alternative methodology is introduced to generate cardinal valuations of health states. This methodology is based on the ranking of differences between health states combined with an associated scaling model that transforms the individual rank data into group values on the interval level. Methods. Data were collected in a Dutch EuroQol EQ-5D valuation study, in which a representative sample (n = 212) of the Dutch population valued a set of 18 EQ-5D health states and death. Three computational steps were undertaken: 1) differences in visual analog scale (VAS) values were computed for each pair of health states based on individual data; 2) the rank ordering of these pairwise differences was derived; 3) nonmetric multidimensional scaling was used to recover cardinal scale values for each state based on these rankings of differences. Results. Scaling of ranked differences between health states using multidimensional scaling produced cardinal values that were nearly identical to the mean VAS valuations. The rank-based values explained 98% of the variance in the VAS values. Conclusion. Ordinal data collection techniques, combined with scaling models, may offer an attractive alternative to direct cardinal elicitation methods for valuing health states.

Key Words: Key words: scaling • health states • values • preferences • visual analog scale • EQ-5D. (Med Decis Making 2007;27:395-405)

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 4, 395-405 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07302131


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?