Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groot Koerkamp, B.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groot Koerkamp, B.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 2, 101-111 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06297394
© 2007 Society for Medical Decision Making

Limitations of Acceptability Curves for Presenting Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Bas Groot Koerkamp, MD, MSc

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

M.G. Myriam Hunink, MD, PhD

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, m.hunink{at}erasmusmc.nl

Theo Stijnen, PhD

Departments of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

James K. Hammitt, PhD

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Karen M. Kuntz, ScD

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Milton C. Weinstein, PhD

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Clinical journals increasingly illustrate uncertainty about the cost and effect of health care interventions using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). CEACs present the probability that each competing alternative is optimal for a range of values of the cost-effectiveness threshold. The objective of this article is to demonstrate the limitations of CEACs for presenting uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analyses. These limitations arise because the CEAC is unable to distinguish dramatically different joint distributions of incremental cost and effect. A CEAC is not sensitive to any change of the incremental joint distribution in the upper left and lower right quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane; neither is it sensitive to radial shift of the incremental joint distribution in the upper right and lower left quadrants. As a result, CEACs are ambiguous to risk-averse policy makers, inhibit integration with risk attitude, hamper synthesis with other evidence or opinions, and are unhelpful to assess the need for more research. Moreover, CEACs may mislead policy makers and can incorrectly suggest medical importance. Both for guiding immediate decisions and for prioritizing future research, these considerable drawbacks of CEACs should make us rethink their use in communicating uncertainty. As opposed to CEACs, confidence and credible intervals do not conflate magnitude and precision of the net benefit of health care interventions. Therefore, they allow (in)formal synthesis of study results with risk attitude and other evidence or opinions. Presenting the value of information in addition to these intervals allows policy makers to evaluate the need for more empirical research.

Key Words: decision making • uncertainty • cost-effectiveness analysis • risk communication


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. Fenwick and A. Briggs
Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curves in the Dock: Case Not Proven?
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 93 - 95.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
A. Schwartz
The Acceptability of Acceptability Curves: Comments on Groot Koerkamp and Others
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 96 - 97.
[PDF]