Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenwick, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenwick, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sutton, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

An Iterative Bayesian Approach to Health Technology Assessment: Application to a Policy of Preoperative Optimization for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

Elisabeth Fenwick, PhD

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, United Kingdom, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, e.fenwick{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Steve Palmer, MSc

Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Karl Claxton, PhD

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, United Kingdom, Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Mark Sculpher, PhD

Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Keith Abrams, PhD

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Alex Sutton, PhD

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

Purpose. This article presents an iterative framework for managing the dynamic process of health technology assessment. The framework uses Bayesian statistical decision theory and value of information (VOI) analysis to inform decision making regarding appropriate patient management and to direct future research effort over the lifetime of a technology. Within the article, the framework is applied to a policy decision regarding preoperative patient management before major elective surgery, for which trial data are available.

Method. The evidence available prior to the trial is used to determine the appropriate method of patient management and to ascertain whether, at the time of commissioning, the trial was potentially worthwhile. The prior information is then updated with the trial data via a Bayesian analysis using informative priors. This post trial information set is then used to reassess the appropriate method for patient management and to determine whether there is a requirement for any further research.

Results. Prior to the trial, preoperative optimization with dopexamine is identified as the appropriate method of patient management. The results of the VOI analysis suggest that a short-term trial was potentially worthwhile (population expected value of perfect information [EVPI] = £48 million). Following the trial, the uncertainty surrounding the choice of appropriate patient management and the potential worth of further research had increased (population EVPI = £67 million).

Conclusions. The article demonstrates the value and practicality of applying the iterative framework to the dynamic process of health technology assessment. It is only by formally incorporating all of the information available to decision makers, through informed priors, that the appropriate decisions can be made.

Key Words: Bayesian analysis • cost-effectiveness analysis • decision analysis • preoperative procedures • technology assessment

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 26, No. 5, 480-496 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06290493


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. Fenwick, K. Claxton, and M. Sculpher
The Value of Implementation and the Value of Information: Combined and Uneven Development
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 21 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
E. Fenwick and A. Briggs
Cost-Effectiveness Acceptability Curves in the Dock: Case Not Proven?
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 93 - 95.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. A. Berry
Bayesian Statistics
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 429 - 430.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. B. Schechter
Posterior Progress
Med Decis Making, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 431 - 433.
[PDF]