This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Osch, S. M. C. Articles by Stiggelbout, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Osch, S. M. C. Articles by Stiggelbout, A. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Exploring the Reference Point in Prospect Theory: Gambles for Length of Life

Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Decision Making, J10-S, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands; phone: +31 (0)71-5264570; fax: +31 (0)71-5266838; s.m.c.van_osch{at}lumc.nl

Wilbert B. van den Hout, PhD

Anne M. Stiggelbout, PhD

Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Attitude toward risk is an important factor determining patient preferences. Risk behavior has been shown to be strongly dependent on the perception of the outcome as either a gain or a loss. According to prospect theory, the reference point determines how an outcome is perceived. However, no theory on the location of the reference point exists, and for the health domain, there is no direct evidence for the location of the reference point. This article combines qualitative with quantitative data to provide evidence of the reference point in life-year certainty equivalent (CE) gambles and to explore the psychology behind the reference point. The authors argue that goals (aspirations) in life influence the reference point. While thinking aloud, 45 healthy respondents gave certainty equivalents for life-year CE gambles with long and short durations of survival. Contrary to suggestions from the literature, qualitative data argued that the offered certainty equivalent most frequently served as the reference point. Thus, respondents perceived life-year CE gambles as mixed. Framing of the question and goals set in life appeared to be important factors behind the psychology of the reference point. On the basis of the authors' quantitative and qualitative data, they argue that goals alter the perception of outcomes as described by prospect theory by influencing the reference point. This relationship is more apparent for the near future as opposed to the remote future, as goals are mostly set for the near future.

Key Words: goals • qualitative research • risk • thinking • utility theory • decision making

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 26, No. 4, 338-346 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06290484


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Kostopoulou The Transient Nature of Utilities and Health Preferences Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 304 - 306. [PDF]