This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Roswarski, T. E. Articles by Murray, M. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roswarski, T. E. Articles by Murray, M. D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Supervision of Students May Protect Academic Physicians from Cognitive Bias: A Study of Decision Making and Multiple Treatment Alternatives in Medicine

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Office of the Dean, Academic Affairs, Ivy Tech Community College, 3101 South Creasy Lane, Lafayette, IN 47905; troswars{at}ivytech.edu

Michael D. Murray, PharmD, MPH

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN

Objective. To determine how professional characteristics and practices of physicians alter the selection of medical treatments involving multiple alternatives. Situations involving multiple alternatives can increase the difficulty of making a decision, resulting in more choice deferral than when fewer alternatives are available. Design, Setting, Participants. A survey and scenario were mailed to a random sample of 314 primary and emergency care physicians affiliated with the Indiana University Medical Center. Using a scenario involving treatment decisions for a patient with osteoarthritis, the effects of multiple treatment alternatives on decision making were explored. Other physician factors included experience, workload, fatigue, continuing education, and supervision. Main Outcome Measures. Physicians’ treatment decisions. Results. Physician response was 61% (n = 192). In contrast to previous studies, physicians in the present study were equally likely to prescribe a new medication, regardless of whether they were deciding about 1 medication or between 2 similar medications (54.5% v. 56.0%, P = 0.841). However, physicians who supervise medical students were far less influenced by the cognitive bias associated with multiple choices than those who did not supervise medical students. Supervising physicians were more likely to defer making a decision when there was only 1 treatment option than when there were 2 (49.3% v. 37%, P = 0.143), whereas the opposite was true for nonsupervising physicians (33.3% v. 63%, P = 0.040). The number of hours spent supervising medical students and the number of years as a physician were also important factors in the decision-making process. Conclusions. Multiple treatment alternatives may result in a deferral of choice. However, this cognitive bias is attenuated by experience and supervision, thus enhancing decision making. Implicit and explicit learning gained through experience and the supervisory process appears to be a central mechanism by which the physicians are protected from this cognitive bias

Key Words: decision making • multiple alternatives • physician practices • supervision • learning

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 26, No. 2, 154-161 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06286483


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?