This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Johnston, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnston, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Determinants of Mortality in Patients with Severe Sepsis

Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana, johnstonja{at}lilly.com

Objective. To evaluate the relative importance of predictors of in-hospital mortality in severe sepsis and compare the performance of generic and disease-specific mortality prediction models.Methods. The author used data from all 826 patients receiving placebo in the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial. After a variety of clinical factors were examined for their univariate association with in-hospital mortality, logistic regression models incorporating successively more inclusive sets of predictors were created and compared. For each model, discrimination was assessed and the relative contribution of each model component to overall model explanatory power evaluated. The accuracy of using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score in isolation as an indicator of "high risk" was assessed by comparing model predictions from APACHE-only models to those of disease-specific models.Results. Age, a number of laboratory values, and APACHE II score were significant univariate predictors of mortality. In multivariable models, age and laboratory values contributed the most information to model predictions; the contribution of the APACHE II score, in particular, the acute physiology component, was modest at best. A risk model including only the total APACHE II score had a c-statistic of 0.686, whereas the best performing disease-specific model had a c-statistic of 0.787. Use of the APACHE II score alone to establish high risk versus low risk resulted in misclassification of 26% of patients.Conclusions. Individual severe sepsis patient outcomes depend on an array of clinical predictors. Models incorporating sepsis disease-specific risk factors may predict mortality more accurately than generic ICU severity measures.

Key Words: sepsis • risk assessment • severity of illness index • prognostication • APACHE II • critical illness

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 25, No. 4, 374-386 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05278933


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Song, K. A Lee, T. S. Park, R. Park, and J. R. Choi Linear Relationship between ADAMTS13 Activity and Platelet Dynamics Even Before Severe Thrombocytopenia Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2008; 38(4): 368 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]