This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Naeim, A. Articles by Mangione, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Naeim, A. Articles by Mangione, C. M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Options for Handling Missing Data in the Health Utilities Index Mark 3

Division of Hematology-Oncology, UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, anaeim{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Emmett B. Keeler, PhD

RAND School of Public Policy, Division of Health Services Research, Santa Monica, California

Carol M. Mangione, MD

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

Background. The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) is a tool composed of 41 questions, covering 8 attributes: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition, and pain. Responses to these questions can define more than 972,000 health situations. This tool allows respondents to answer "Don’t Know," for which there is no scoring instruction, to any given question. This situation creates a break in the scoring algorithm and leads to considerable amounts of missing data. The goal of this study is to develop strategies to deal with HUI3 scores for participants who have missing data. Methods. The authors used data from 248 individuals enrolled in the Cataract Management Trial, focusing on the HUI3 vision and ambulation attributes, which had 19% and 10% of attribute levels missing, respectively. Inspection and deduction were used to fill in values independent of the value of the missing data, then alternative analytic techniques were compared, including mean substitution, model scoring, hot deck, multiple imputation, and regression imputation. Results. Inspection and logical deduction reduced the percentage of missing information in the HUI3 by 49% to 87%. A comparison of analytic techniques used for the remaining HUI3 vision data missing demonstrated the value of building models based on internal response patterns and that simple analytic techniques fare as well as more complicated ones when the number of missing cases is small. Conclusion.Analyzing the pattern of responses in cases where the attribute level score is missing reduces the amount of missing data and can simplify the analytic process for the remaining missing data.

Key Words: health utilities index • missing data • non-response • pattern analysis • imputation

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 25, No. 2, 186-198 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05275153


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?