Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westbrook, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Coiera, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westbrook, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Coiera, E. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of an Online Evidence System on Confidence in Decision Making in a Controlled Setting

Johanna I. Westbrook, PhD

Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia, j.westbrook{at}unsw.edu.au

A. Sophie Gosling, PsychD

Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia

Enrico W. Coiera, MB, BS, PhD

Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia

Objective. To examine the impact of online evidence retrieval on clinicians’ decision-making confidence and to determine if this differs for experienced doctors and nurses. Methods. A sample of 44 doctors and 31 clinical nurse consultants (CNCs) answered 8 clinical scenarios (600 scenario answers) before and after the use of online evidence resources. Clinicians rated their confidence in scenario answers and in the evidence they found using the information system. Results. Prior to using online evidence, 37% of doctors and 18% of CNCs answered the scenarios correctly. These clinicians were more confident (56% very confident or confident) in their answers than those with incorrect (34%) answers. Doctors with incorrect answers prior to searching rated their confidence significantly higher than did nurses who were incorrect. After searching, both groups answered 50% of scenarios correctly. Clinicians with correct answers had greater confidence in the evidence found compared to those with incorrect answers. Doctors were more confident in evidence found confirming an initially correct answer than were nurses. More than 50% of clinicians who persisted with an incorrect answer after searching reported that they were confident or very confident in the evidence found. Clinicians who did not know scenario answers before searching placed equal confidence in evidence that led them to a correct or incorrect answer. Conclusions. The information obtained from an online evidence system influenced clinicians’ confidence in their answers to the clinical scenarios. The relationship between confidence in answers and correctness is complex. Both existing knowledge and professional role were mediating factors. The finding that many clinicians placed confidence in information that led them to incorrect answers warrants further investigation.

Key Words: decision support system • clinical • decision making • evidence based practice

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 25, No. 2, 178-185 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05275155


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. Y.S. Lau and E. W. Coiera
Can Cognitive Biases during Consumer Health Information Searches Be Reduced to Improve Decision Making?
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2009; 16(1): 54 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
G. Del Fiol, P. J. Haug, J. J. Cimino, S. P. Narus, C. Norlin, and J. A. Mitchell
Effectiveness of Topic-specific Infobuttons: A Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2008; 15(6): 752 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
K. A. McKibbon and D. B. Fridsma
Effectiveness of Clinician-selected Electronic Information Resources for Answering Primary Care Physicians' Information Needs
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2006; 13(6): 653 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
W. R. Hersh
Ubiquitous but Unfinished: Online Information Retrieval Systems
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 147 - 148.
[PDF]