| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04268960 Pramipexole v. Levodopa as Initial Treatment for Parkinsons Disease: A Randomized Clinical-Economic Trial
Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.
Department of Community and the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York; 601 Elmwood Ave., Box 673, Rochester, NY 14642; telephone: (585) 273-4241robert.holloway{at}ctcc.rochester.edu Parkinson Study Group Purpose.To determine the 2-year incremental cost effectiveness of initial pramipexole treatment compared with initial levodopa treatment in patientswith early Parkinsons disease (PD).Methods.301 subjects with early PD were randomized to either pramipexole or levodopa and followed every 3 months over a 2-year period. Costs were assigned to patient collected health utilization data using a variety of methods. Health state preferences were estimated using the EuroQol.Results.Pramipexole strategy was an estimated $2,138 (SE = $1,182) more expensive than levodopa strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness of pramipexole compared with levodopa was $106,900/QALY (EQ-5D), compared with pramipexole being dominated by levodopa using the EQVAS.Conclusions.Although considerable uncertainty exists in the 2-year cost-effectiveness of initial pramipexole compared with initial levodopa in the treatment of early PD, our estimates suggest that pramipexole may not be welfare enhancing during the first 2 years of treatment. If initial pramipexole results in long-term improvements in quality of life, its cost-effectiveness will become more favorable.
Key Words: Parkinsons disease levodopa pramipexole randomized clinical trials quality of life cost-effectiveness net benefit societal welfare
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


