This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stahl, J. E. Articles by Gazelle, G. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stahl, J. E. Articles by Gazelle, G. S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Reorganizing the System of Care Surrounding Laparoscopic Surgery: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Discrete-Event Simulation

Department of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merimac St., 10th floor, Boston, MA 02114; phone: 617-724-4447; fax: 617-726-9414james{at}mgh-ita.org,jstahl@partners.org

David Rattner, MD

Department of Surgery,Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Richard Wiklund, MD

Operating Room Administration, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Jessica Lester, MM

Molly Beinfeld, MPH

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

G. Scott Gazelle, MD, MPH, PhD

Department of Radiology, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Purpose. To determine the cost-effectiveness of a proposed reorganization of surgical and anesthesia care to balance patient volume and safety.Methods.Discrete-event simulation methods were used to compare current surgical practice with a newmodular system in which patient care is handed off between 2 anesthesiologists. Ahealth care system’s perspective, using hospital and professional costs, was chosen for the cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes were patient throughput, flow time, wait time, and resource use. Sensitivity analyses were performed on staffing levels, mortality rates, process times, and scheduled patient volume.Results.The new strategy was more effective (average 4.41 patients/d [median = 5] v. 4.29 [median = 4]) and had similar costs (average cost/ patient/d = $5327 v. $5289) to the current strategywith an incremental cost-effectiveness of $318/additional patient treated/d. Surgical mortality rate must be >4% or hand-off delay >15min before the new strategy is no longermore effective.Conclusion.The proposed system is more cost-effective relative to current practice over a wide range of mortality rates, hand-off times, and scheduled patient volumes.

Key Words: computer simulation • discrete event simulation • anesthesia • cost-effectiveness

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 24, No. 5, 461-471 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04268951


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. T. Egan and W. S. Sandberg Auto Identification Technology and Its Impact on Patient Safety in the Operating Room of the Future Surgical Innovation, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 41 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. R. Seim, B. Andersen, D. L. Berger, S. M. Sokal, and W. S. Sandberg The Effect of Direct-From-Recovery Room Discharge of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients on Recovery Room Workload Surgical Innovation, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. D. Roberts To Err Is Human Med Decis Making, October 1, 2004; 24(5): 534 - 535. [PDF]