Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holtgrave, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holtgrave, D. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

HIV Prevention, Cost-Utility Analysis, and Race/Ethnicity: Methodological Considerations and Recommendations

David R. Holtgrave, PhD

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

In this methodological article, the author reviews 1) the disproportionate impact that HIV/AIDS is having on communities of color in the United States, 2) what is known about the cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions for racial/ethnic minority communities (including the methods used in these studies), and 3) the relative lack of methodological guidance in the field for conducting economic evaluation studies specifically for communities of color. The author finds that race/ethnicity affects cost-utility analyses in several heretofore unrecognized ways. In this article, methodological techniques to address these concerns are proposed. In particular, the author recommends cost-utility analytic strategies that maximize comparability among studies and avoid the introduction of methodological discrimination.

Key Words: MESH headings • HIV • acquired immunodeficiency syndrome • cost and cost analysis • primary prevention

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 24, No. 2, 181-191 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04263342
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
D. J. Gaskin and K. D. Frick
Race and Ethnic Disparities in Valuing Health
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 12 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]