Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Decision Making
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gandjour, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lauterbach, K. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gandjour, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lauterbach, K. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

When Is It Worth Introducing a Quality Improvement Program? A Mathematical Model

Afschin Gandjour, MD, PhD

Institut for Gesundheits konomie und Klinische Epidemiologie, Universitt zu Kln, Gleueler Strae 176-178, 50935 Kln, Germany; telephone: 49-(0)221-46867-20; fax: 49-(0)221-46867-10; afschin.gandjour{at}medizin.uni-koeln.de

Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach, MD, DSc

Quality improvement programs must compete with other health care interventions for limited health care resources. The goal of the research presented here was to develop a model that portrays the mathematical relationship between the size of a quality deficit caused by the noncompliance of health professionals and the cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement program. The model allows the determination of the minimum size of a quality deficit for which it is worth introducinga quality improvement program. If a quality improvement program has already been implemented, the model can be used to define the quality threshold beyond which a reduction in quality becomes economically unattractive. An example consideringthe reduction of underuse in depression treatment demonstrates that an intervention with a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio may become economically unattractive once the costs for the implementation effort are considered.

Key Words: quality problem • quality • improvement program • cost-effectiveness

Medical Decision Making, Vol. 23, No. 6, 518-525 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03258441
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
T. Hoomans, J. L. Severens, S. M. A. A. Evers, and A. J. H. A. Ament
Value for Money in Changing Clinical Practice: Should Decisions about Guidelines and Implementation Strategies Be Made Sequentially or Simultaneously?
Med Decis Making, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 207 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
A. Gandjour
Changing the Organization of Health Care
JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 286 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
A. Gandjour and K. W. Lauterbach
How Much Does It Cost to Change the Behavior of Health Professionals? A Mathematical Model and an Application to Academic Detailing
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 341 - 347.
[Abstract] [PDF]