Medical Decision Making

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baron, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ubel, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baron, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ubel, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Decision Making, Vol. 23, No. 5, 422-434 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03257277

Effect of Assessment Method on the Discrepancy between Judgments of Health Disorders People have and do not have: A Web Study

Jonathan Baron, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, baron{at}psych.upenn.edu

David A. Asch, MD, MBA

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Angela Fagerlin, PhD

Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System and the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Program for Improving Health Care Decisions, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Christopher Jepson, PhD

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

George Loewenstein, PhD

Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie-Mellon University

Jason Riis, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Margaret G. Stineman, MD

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia

Peter A. Ubel, MD

Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System and the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Program for Improving Health Care Decisions, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Three experiments on the World Wide Web asked subjects to rate the severity of common health disorders such as acne or arthritis. People who had a disorder ("Haves") tended to rate it as less severe than people who did not have it ("Not-haves"). Two explanations of this Have versus Not-have discrepancy were rejected. By one account, people change their reference point when they rate a disorder that they have. More precise reference points would, on this account, reduce the discrepancy, but, if anything, the discrepancy was larger. By another account, people who do not have the disorder focus on attributes that are most affected by it, and the discrepancy should decrease when people make ratings on several attributes. Again, if anything, the discrepancy increased when ratings were on separate attributes (combined by a weighted average). The discrepancy varied in size and direction across disorders. Subjects also thought that they would be less affected than others.

Key Words: adaptation • utility assessment • response shift • focusing illusion


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
L. A. Prosser and E. Wittenberg
Do Risk Attitudes Differ across Domains and Respondent Types?
Med Decis Making, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]